On 31/10/2021 18:35, skybuck2000 wrote:
>
> You do know you get automatic de-duplication because filename
> metadata
> is stored independently of content (blobs), so copied file
> contents take
> up zero room!
>
>
> I am in doubt what this means. I take the blog theory of GIT wi
On 31/10/2021 18:35, skybuck2000 wrote:
>
> Git stores snapshots. It will
>
>
> I may have noticed this. I did notice the GIT database can get quite
> large. One example is PascalCoin... it's git database seems to be 100
> MB... it shouldn't be that big I think, I don't think the sources are
>
A few follow ups.
On 31/10/2021 17:57, skybuck2000 wrote:
>
>
> the Git repo built. At least it gives a better overview, though the
> diffs can be terrible.
>
>
> Why were the diffs terribles to many code changes all at once ?
Terrible in the sense that it was "all the code changes at once
>
> I bet Git
> feels like one of those taxi rides through an unfamiliar city..
>
The GIT bash feels a bit cyber-punk-ish =D
It feels very cool, though there are plenty of git bash/text/gui bugs and
flickers and issues as well as the editor.
I particularly like the
git log --graph --all
co
the Git repo built. At least it gives a better overview, though the
> diffs can be terrible.
>
Why were the diffs terribles to many code changes all at once ?
Git is especially good in collaborative work, without some top knob
> being in 'control'. The hash is simple and unique and avoids al
On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 2:27:29 PM UTC+1 o...@ucm.es wrote:
> I have to admit, I am a bit lost in your description. A couple of remarks,
> though.
>
I thought it was simple enough but ok, I will try and give a procedural
description and some further explanations.
The procedural for m
On 31/10/2021 05:14, skybuck2000 wrote:
> Anyway I hope to have convinced you somewhat that GIT is not ideal for
> me, it's risky if something bad happens to it's database, it's
> cumbersome to use, it's slow for that reason, lot's of overhead.
What you know is almost always better that some rando
On 31/10/2021 05:14, skybuck2000 wrote:
> My own versioning system is very simple and used for solo development
> 99.9%.
>
> I will give an example of how this works.
>
> The main thing is "folders", "version number in folders" and "comments
> in folders".
>
> For example, let's suppose I want
>>> "s" == skybuck2000 writes:
> My own versioning system is very simple and used for solo development
> 99.9%.
> I will give an example of how this works.
> The main thing is "folders", "version number in folders" and "comments in
> folders".
> For example, let's suppose I want to test
