Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-26 Thread Igor Djordjevic
Hi Mark, On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 12:48:25 AM UTC+2, Mark Waite wrote: > > Yes, your simplification expresses what I was trying to achieve. > Good, then we understood each other, thanks for confirming :) > I specifically merged from master to one so that one could be tested with > the

Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-26 Thread Mark Waite
Yes, your simplification expresses what I was trying to achieve. I specifically merged from master to one so that one could be tested with the merge from master. The subsequent merge from one to master was to have master include a commit which shows one merged into it. Same pattern for master

Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-26 Thread Igor Djordjevic
Hi JNickVA, On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 8:44:13 PM UTC+2, JNickVA wrote: > 3. and 4. I don't even have enough information to know the state of the > master when each of the 2 branches were created > What do you mean here? Isn`t Git history showing you the exact state of "master" when each

Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-26 Thread Igor Djordjevic
Hi Mark, On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 2:58:21 PM UTC+2, Mark Waite wrote: > > You might consider a series of steps to perform the merge. Some of the > steps might include: > >1. Merge from master to branch one so that the diffs between branch >one and master are only changes on branch

Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-26 Thread JNickVA
Michael, 1. At this stage I am not sure that what is in production is represented by the master branch, and if it was at one time, when that might have been. 2. I am taking over the project from a group of developers who have been working remotely with little ort no supervision. I have 2 weeks

Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-25 Thread Michael
On 2017-07-25, at 5:38 AM, JNickVA wrote: > I have recently been put in charge of a code repository that contains a > MASTER and several branches. My task is to try to merge the root and the top > two most frequently used branches into a new repository. I face two

Re: [git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-25 Thread Mark Waite
You might consider a series of steps to perform the merge. Some of the steps might include: 1. Merge from master to branch one so that the diffs between branch one and master are only changes on branch one, test the resulting merge. Review and understand the remaining differences

[git-users] Git branch merge strategies

2017-07-25 Thread JNickVA
I have recently been put in charge of a code repository that contains a MASTER and several branches. My task is to try to merge the root and the top two most frequently used branches into a new repository. I face two problems: the branches have not been merged to the root in a long time, and