Thx Mark,
in fact as it is for personal purpose i'm facing the advantage of both
structure.
For easy maintenance, a huge git repository would be great. However all
"subprojects" are in fact independent from each other as they are mainly
Wordpress or Joomla plugins or even graphical artwork. So
On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 9:26:44 AM UTC-6, Alain wrote:
>
> Thx Alex,
>
> regarding structure of Git repository i would like to understand something.
> I've read book and watched videos with several "trends / methods" regard
> sync several computers together.
>
> 1st method is to have
Thx Alex,
regarding structure of Git repository i would like to understand something.
I've read book and watched videos with several "trends / methods" regard
sync several computers together.
1st method is to have several git repository (1 per project)
2nd method is to have 1 main git repository
Hi,
As BitBucket is high available I suggest to keep it as a main central repo.
To have sync-ed copy of it you can have repos in any other places.
Start them with *git clone --mirror * and update them
once every minute with *git remote update --prune*.
Alex
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:51 PM,
Hi,
i use for now BitBucket (from ATlassian) but in order to not depend on
internet connection, i would like to be sure both computer (laptop and
desktop) always have the same code.
As git is a distributed system, i would like to sync not only 1 repository
but all repositories at once.
