Re: [git-users] Re: Problem with git checkout --orphan

2013-06-07 Thread Dale R. Worley
From: Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com Repos (or branches) without history are funny places where a lot of operations make less or more sense. The place to address this is the Git developer mailing list, but the use-case does sound a bit, well, pointless. It's true that it's not

[git-users] Re: Problem with git checkout --orphan

2013-06-06 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
On Thursday, June 6, 2013 8:51:50 PM UTC+2, Dale Worley wrote: When you want to create a new branch that has no ancestors, you use git checkout --orphan to set the repository in a state where the next commit will have no parents. However, it appears that one can only do git checkout

Re: [git-users] Re: Problem with git checkout --orphan

2013-06-06 Thread John McKown
What I did, when I wanted to initialize some more-or-less empty branches was to have a single file in all of them. Called, cleverly, branch git init echo 'master' branch git add . git commit -m 'master' git checkout --orphan b2 echo 'b2' branch git add . git commit -m 'b2' # and so on And, if