On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 06:43 -0700, dexter ietf wrote:
> git clone with --bare option was significantly faster, so
>
> i just assumed it fetches the bare-minimum data.
> thanks for your detailed answer, it all makes sense now.
The difference in time tells you how long it takes to extract a worki
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 5:58:21 PM UTC+5:30, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
> dexter ietf > wrote:
>
> > bare repository only contains the meta data, but when i clone from a
>
>
git clone with --bare option was significantly faster, so
i just a
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
dexter ietf wrote:
> bare repository only contains the meta data, but when i clone from a
> bare-repo
> full tree will be checked out. how does git manage to achieve that. i
> know it's
> a newbie question. but surprised by the fact that git can do that.
Hi,
bare repository only contains the meta data, but when i clone from a
bare-repo
full tree will be checked out. how does git manage to achieve that. i know
it's
a newbie question. but surprised by the fact that git can do that. so
curious to
know the answer asap. thanks.
-dexter
--
You rec
