This might not be the *best* way to approach this, but what if you one repo
with 3 unique branches: A, B, C; then two other branches, i.e.: AB, BC.
You would then do work in the unique branches and pull changes from them into
the combined ones when needed.
Again, this might not be ideal, but
Thanks, Joe.
The idea is interesting but imagine then what repository would look
like:
At least 3 shared branches. Developing code always in branches and
never come back to the master.
On Sep 13, 5:43 pm, Joe Hassick ehass...@gmail.com wrote:
This might not be the *best* way to approach this,