[git-users] Using branches within a git svn repository

2011-03-16 Thread Hillel (Sabba) Markowitz
I created a git repository using the instructions in
http://blog.tfnico.com/2010/08/syncing-your-git-repo-with-subversion.html
and it seems to be set up correctly. The svn fetch repository has
branches as

* master
remotes/branch1
remotes/branch2

while the bare repository (for the team to pull from and push to)  just has

* master


In the svn repository should I run

git branch branch1 remotes/branch1
git branch branch2 remotes/branch2

In that case, should I push

git push origin branch1
git push origin branch2
git push origin master

Or is there a way to handle the pushing fully without specifying what
needs to be pushed?

For example would git push origin be sufficient?

When keeping the fetch repository up to date do I always use git svn
rebase or do I need to do git svn fetch to keep the branches up to
date?

--
       Sabba     -          סבא הלל        -     Hillel
Hillel (Sabba) Markowitz | Said the fox to the fish, Join me ashore
 sabbahil...@gmail.com | The fish are the Jews, Torah is our water
http://sabbahillel.blogspot.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git 
for human beings group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.



[git-users] git revert deleted my files - how to restore

2011-03-16 Thread pbg
Hi,
   Im a beginner to git . I did a git add directory . It added
all the files in the directory some of them are .o and generated files
so i did not want to commit . so i did a git revert . After that i see
that git revert removed all  my files in directory  .. i did not
expect that . How to restore my files?  .It removed all the files i
have worked on for some time. I had to rewrite all the files again. I
think this is not a good behaviour of git .. Is this correct ? is
there any way i can restore my files ?

Thanks,
Chandra

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git 
for human beings group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.



Re: [git-users] git revert deleted my files - how to restore

2011-03-16 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:33:37AM -0700, pbg wrote:

Im a beginner to git . I did a git add directory . It added
 all the files in the directory some of them are .o and generated files
 so i did not want to commit . so i did a git revert . After that i see
 that git revert removed all  my files in directory  .. i did not
 expect that . How to restore my files?  .It removed all the files i
 have worked on for some time. I had to rewrite all the files again. I
 think this is not a good behaviour of git .. Is this correct ?
It's better phrased that it's not a behaviour of Git you expected.
I mean that if Git would refuse to delete the files added by the
commit being reverted, that could raise some eyebrows, too.

 is there any way i can restore my files ?
Yes.
Reverting a commit does not rewrite history but rather it's appending a
new record to the chain of commit: git-revert records a new commit which
undoes the changes introduced by the reverted commit. Hence, the
original commit is still present in the history record and, which might
or might not be more important, the commit immediately preceding the new
one introduced by git-revert's action is also present.
So, to undo what git-revert did just immediately perform
$ git reset --hard HEAD^
which just forgets the tip commit (that one recorded by git-revert).
Note that obviously this only works if you did not commit anything
after git-revert. Otherwise you would either use rebasing to remove the
commit recorded by git-revert or just revert it.

In other words, please read the git-revert man page and try to fully
understand what git-revert does. Then the ways to undo its changes will
be clear (provided you have read about undoing changes in Git which is
assumed).

P.S.
For the future, note that git-revert supports the --no-commit command
line option which allows you to edit the index formed by the git-revert
action before committing its state. So you could use it to unstage the
deletion of correct files and then commit.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git 
for human beings group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.



[git-users] Re: Using branches within a git svn repository

2011-03-16 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
Hi Sabba,

With the proper configuration, only one push is needed.

Check out this more recent post, it covers an example setup for handling 
branches in a similar setup:

http://blog.tfnico.com/2010/11/git-svn-mirror-for-multiple-branches.html

As you can see, the magic is in the push-configuration in .git/config


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git 
for human beings group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.