Hum, well I didn't even notice this one last time I was looking through the
alternatives.
I was looking for some tool that was able to show side-by-side diffs. In the
end we ended up installing Gerrit.
We just use normal Gitweb as repo web frontend. I haven't yet found any good
reasons to
Thanks,
I use cGit and really have not found a reason to replace it yet. However I
now have a user who wants to do branching, merging
and rebase functions through a web interface.
I really don't like the idea but I do need to see if it's feasible.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Thomas
Yes, in very early stages of development. I think they are at version 0.8.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oh, now I realized that gitg is like a desktop Git client.
cgit on the other hand is a repository web frontend. These are two
Hello Bill,
Your user may want gerrit ;)
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:22:46 -0700
Bill Shoenhair bshoenh...@gmail.com wrote:
BSThanks,
BS
BSI use cGit and really have not found a reason to replace it yet.
BSHowever I now have a user who wants to do branching, merging
BSand rebase functions through a
Yes, my thoughts exactly.
The more that I think about it the less I like the idea. There is a reason
they decided to go with clone, add, merge, commit etc
in the local the local workspace and then push to the servers.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com
