On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:29:10PM -0700, Sam Roberts wrote:
I don't see anything in the docs (other than a gui.pruneduringfetch).
I'd be OK with a global default, I think I want this always, but a
per/remote option for .git/config would be nice to.
Have I missed this somewhere?
I have the
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:46:49PM -0700, Jimit Modi wrote:
At our company, we are evaulating to migrate to GIT from SVN. Here we are
following a process in which we have the following branch and access
control.
---
| Branch| Purpose
Well the branches do not need to be on the same location/folder/computer.
The devs could push to e.g. /cmdata/git/devs/myproject.git
The tl pulls from devs and pushes to e.g. /cmdata/git/tl/myproject.git
The agm pulls from tl and could push to e.g. /cmdata/git/agm/myproject.git
You just
I do not think it's possible to only clone a part of a repo. That being
said, I have not experimented with subtree nor submodule. Have you look
into that yet?
i've looked into submodule i don't think that's what i need.
i need to look at subtree. btw, i tried cloning to local
disk running git
From: joeriel...@gmail.com
At some point I added a large file into a git repository.
It now exists on multiple branches, possibly with some
changes to it. I'd like to remove it from git, but leave its
current form (say the one on the master branch) on the
file system.
You've figured
If it is still in the working directory, why not rename it (using OS
commands, not git command), do the git command to remove all traces as
previously mentioned, then rename it back?
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.eduwrote:
From: joeriel...@gmail.com
At
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
joeriel...@gmail.com wrote:
At some point I added a large file into a git repository.
It now exists on multiple branches, possibly with some
changes to it. I'd like to remove it from git, but leave its
current form (say the one on the master
On Monday, August 19, 2013 10:53:34 AM UTC-7, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
joeri...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
At some point I added a large file into a git repository.
It now exists on multiple branches, possibly with some
changes to it.
That seems the simplest approach. Thanks.
On Monday, August 19, 2013 10:48:59 AM UTC-7, John McKown wrote:
If it is still in the working directory, why not rename it (using OS
commands, not git command), do the git command to remove all traces as
previously mentioned, then rename it back?
From: peter boudewijns ing...@gmail.com
I've been trying to put my filesystem for a very small busybox-based distro
into a git-repository. And with succes. The only strange thing I can not
get my head around is the following :
When making a compressed tarball from the files from the
- Original Message -
From: peter boudewijns
To: git-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:10 PM
Subject: [git-users] Strange effect when tar-ing a cloned repository
Hi All,
I've been trying to put my filesystem for a very small busybox-based distro
into
I've made a small change to the Git source and now test
t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh fails. In particular, this test fails:
test_expect_success \
'4 - carry forward local addition.' \
'bash -x 2/tmp/2 -c rm -f .git/index
read_tree_must_succeed $treeH
git checkout-index -u -f
Hello,
Can git display presence of stashed changes in the repository in the output
of git-status? If the answer is no, do you think it would be a welcome
addition?
The story: today I was quite puzzled to see a change I remember doing some
time ago has been lost and not to be found on any
On 19 August 2013 21:10, peter boudewijns ing...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
[...]
When making a compressed tarball from the files from the repository (after
clone/checkout) I get a very much larger tar.gz-file. Size goes up from 16M
to 21M (!?)
Not so strange. git is very good at
- Original Message -
From: Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu
I've made a small change to the Git source and now test
t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh fails. In particular, this test fails:
test_expect_success \
'4 - carry forward local addition.' \
'bash -x 2/tmp/2 -c rm -f
On Monday, August 19, 2013 10:51:26 PM UTC+2, Alex Shulgin wrote:
Hello,
Can git display presence of stashed changes in the repository in the
output of git-status? If the answer is no, do you think it would be a
welcome addition?
The story: today I was quite puzzled to see a change I
16 matches
Mail list logo
