On 2015-02-24, at 10:40 PM, Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.eu wrote:
Hello,
yes, basically that is the way. There is an option in recent Git called
shallow clone, which doesn't clone the whole history, only the last N
commits. You can also specify the branch name you want to use
For shallow clones, you can use the --depth parameter, and for the branch,
well, --branch. For more fine grained options you should consult the
git-init manpage, which may present you other useful switches.
For the last N commit part: N can be any positive integer, including one.
This makes it
On 2015-02-22, at 9:04 PM, Nicolas Dermine nicolas.derm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Michael keybou...@gmail.com wrote:
So a quick question: How do I undo/abort a merge?
I am learning, and experimenting. I was experimenting with git merge,
forgot the
But I actually would like to have them in the master branch, as these
should include thee complete analysis, including source code, input data,
output data and resulting images and report - so including the ./output and
./cache directories.
Is this possible somehow?
Rainer
On Monday,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:06:38PM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
I forget to send to the mailing list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [git-users] How to use git to store large files without
keeping track
Sorry for slow reply -- my subscription settings were not what I thought!
It's difficult for me to say as I was not actively tracking my use of the
repository, but I did use it during that period. I certainly pulled and
pushed, probably to both of the two remotes that it has. The objects do
On Monday, 16 February 2015 03:21:20 UTC, Dale Worley wrote:
philli...@newcastle.ac.uk javascript: (Phillip Lord) writes:
I have made a single branch clone of a repository. Originally, it was
around 2Mb in size (compared to about 150Mb for a normal clone). Over
time, though it has
