Unfortunately, the graphs are too long and complicated for some more
serious eyeballing, but important point should be _there are_ graphs,
meaning both "branchA" and "branchB" contain commit
9ba8f06829b2d2170f23254ed3fe8f3727fe56dc... but that we already knew, I`m
afraid.
So, it does seem
Hi Michael,
[don't abuse the fact that 'head' on windows will find the HEAD pseudoref
file, as there are a few cases where it fails - there's been mention
recently on the Git List in the last week or so]
You didn't say what messages you got from the rebase command - did it say
how many