[git-users] How to use filter-branch with --state-branch?
How to use filter-branch with --state-branch? Recent versions of git filter-branch command introduced the --state-branch option. BTW I can't find any info about how this can be actually used. We have this repository on github: https://github.com/concrete5/concrete5 When someone pushes to that repo, we clone it and execute git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter concrete to extract the concrete directory, and we push the result to https://github.com/concrete5/concrete5-core (including all the branches and tags) The script at the moment is this one: https://github.com/concrete5/core_splitter/blob/70879e676b95160f7fc5d0ffc22b8f7420b0580b/bin/splitcore I tried to use the --state-branch option on a local mirror, so that we could do an incremental filtering. Here's the script: # Executed just one time git clone --no-checkout --mirror \ https://github.com/concrete5/concrete5.git work cd work git filter-branch \ --subdirectory-filter concrete \ --tag-name-filter cat \ --prune-empty \ --state-branch FILTERBRANCH_STATE \ -- --all # Executed every time the repo is updated git remote update --prune git filter-branch \ --subdirectory-filter concrete \ --tag-name-filter cat \ --prune-empty \ --state-branch FILTERBRANCH_STATE \ -- --all The first filter-branch call required 7168 steps, so did the second call... I also tried without the --prune option of remote update (I had to add --force to the second filter-branch), but nothing changed. Any hint about how we can have filter-branch work in an incremental way? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [git-users] Can I limit the set of files that git checks to see if they were modified?
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:41:12AM -0800, Duane Knesek wrote: > Say I have a huge source tree. And I know that only files X, Y, and Z have > changed. Is there a way (through a plug-in or otherwise) for me to tell > git to ignore every other file when I do a status, commit, etc.? Yes. Read the git-update-index manual page about the "--assume-unchanged" option supported by that command. Searching the 'net for the git+assume+unchanged should have you covered with tutorials. Be sure to be careful with this facility though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
