Do you have any information of delegates and Git? I haven't come across
that feature yet. Could be useful to OP.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Gadget/Steve gadgetst...@hotmail.comwrote:
On 26/09/2012 6:51 PM, Max Hodges wrote:
Yes I don't disagree: that notion of locking a file makes
When you amend the second commit replaces the results of the first. It's
for the occasion when you commit too early and possibly forget to add some
files, or you mess up your commit message.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Thiago Rossi thiagorossi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello everybody!
I am new
the log might have a record of the amend, but the first commit has actually
been replaced.
If this is undesirable, then perhaps you should create a new commit rather
than an amend.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Max Hodges m...@whiterabbitpress.comwrote:
When you amend the second commit
Hum, well it might be currently implemented in a way that leaves traces,
but it seems amend is documented to replace the previous commit with the
new one. Future implementations and garbage collection may vary. What's the
purpose of trying to see if traces of this previous commit exist anyway?
defaults to '30 days'
Search amend (587 hits in 95 files) if you want to dig in! :)
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Max Hodges m...@whiterabbitpress.comwrote:
Hum, well it might be currently implemented in a way that leaves traces,
but it seems amend is documented to replace the previous
Other types of dangling objects (blobs and trees) are also possible, and
dangling objects can arise in other situations.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Max Hodges m...@whiterabbitpress.comwrote:
just peeked at the source files and noticed this text
other (none distributed) systems are certainly easier to learn. We were
fine with GIT for a few weeks, then suddenly our project is no longer
working as expected. Hope we can sort it out with a bit of professional
help.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
repopulate it from a client and you have everything
restored.
I use git all the time even if the code does not leave one machine. It
allows me to track changes and experiment and easily give my clients
patches.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Max Hodges m...@whiterabbitpress.com
wrote:
Git
Hi Damien,
I tried the first step but I get an error which I don't fully comprehend
Max Hodges@DUCHESS /D/Documents/GIT-repos/wre-website (fixed-livevalidation)
$ git checkout --track -b master remote/origin/master
fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching branches.
Did
make
sense.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Max Hodges m...@whiterabbitpress.comwrote:
Hi Damien,
I tried the first step but I get an error which I don't fully comprehend
Max Hodges@DUCHESS /D/Documents/GIT-repos/wre-website
(fixed-livevalidation)
$ git checkout --track -b master remote
I think I found a way to sort it out. I deleted my local repo, then used
the Clone function in SmartGit to start over
Max Hodges@DUCHESS /D/Documents/GIT-repos/wre-website2 (master)
$ git branch -a
* master
remotes/origin/#1-google-analytics-jquery-tracking
remotes/origin/#4
remotes/origin
I think the best way to get more efficient with using Git is to simply
start using a GUI. Then these operations are all just a matter of a few
clicks.
I use SmartGit myself. some others are listed here
http://git-scm.com/downloads/guis
On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:33, Gabriel Lau
a hacker or something ;)
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:47:12 +0900
Max Hodges m...@whiterabbitpress.com wrote:
I think the best way to get more efficient with using Git is to simply
start using a GUI
Hi Kramer,
I know what you mean. I'm also an experienced, IT professional and findi
Git to be very difficult and confusing to use. According the Linus Torvalds
it used to be a much worse. He said it used to require quite a lot of brain
power, but that other came along after him and make it cool
merge commit locally then push to server, I think.
On Oct 30, 2012, at 15:01, Cesar Casasola cesarsis...@gmail.com wrote:
I finished to push my changes from clone repository to server repository
but repository's files are outdated.
repository (local repository). Then
to push changes to remote repository (server repository). When a tema
member clone the server repository get last changes committed but when view
files are outdated...I don't know what happens...
By the way the red text from the image that means?
2012/10/30 Max
16 matches
Mail list logo
