well it might be currently implemented in a way that leaves traces, but it
seems amend is documented to replace the previous commit with the new one.
Future implementations and garbage collection may vary. What's the purpose
of trying to see if traces of this previous commit exist anyway?
I
On Aug 28, 2012 8:51 PM, Ryan Hodson hodson.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, you can use the -b shortcut to save a step:
git checkout develop
git checkout -b some-feature
If you're going to use a shortcut, use a shortcut!
git checkout -b some-feature develop
--
You received this message because
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
In my shop, we back up each Git repo on the main server to its mirror
bare repository on another box using a call to `git fetch`:
git fetch --quiet --prune repo '+refs/*:refs/*'
which essentially
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Quite probably. The problem with `git clone` is that it's supposed to
create a repository, but we keep the mirror repositories around
(I mean, they are not tarred and gzipped, and just sit there
GitHub covers this in their Fork A Repo help page:
https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo
See the section, Pull in upstream changes.
Adam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Git
for human beings group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Andrew Gavin axga...@googlemail.comwrote:
I would like to reliably carry over the tags from the fetch branches to
the respective branches that I'm going to dcommit. I thought I could do a
rev-list checking the tree-hash of the commit and making sure that they
In git, there are local and remote branches. A local branch is created by
doing something like `git branch` or `git checkout -b`. You can checkout
local branches.
By which I mean: you can check them out and have the branch update simply
by doing a commit.
Suppose you know that a file on
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 07:40, tombert tomb...@live.at wrote:
git fetch updates your local database, but the local database is
not the same as in svn or cvs. In git you have a local and a remote
database and neither the local nor remote database does/needs not
contain any files you work on
If you're asking how do I pull only one specific file from the remote
server, I think the short answer is: you can't, Git is not SVN. However,
if you're against doing a full pull, you could do `git fetch origin; git
checkout origin/master -- file`. This will do a full update from the
origin
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I honestly do not want to appear as wishing to be smarter than those
smart guys who wrote Git, but I'm yet to see a developer around me who
really thinks of Git (or any other [D]VCS for that matter) in
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Phlip phlip2...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I'm still trying to go from a hashtag to a tag. I'll see if I can
follow up when I find it - it should be easy, right?
git show-ref --tags | grep de049647a1ea285ce7791dc4ebf01ddfc564ddad
If the tag is the only ref for
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 02:13:09PM -0700, koshy Koshy wrote:
If the commit b was the tip of the branch and you did not do any
checkouts after checking out a, then
$ git checkout ORIG_HEAD
should
Great idea for a project!
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
tfn...@gmail.comwrote:
That being said, I would probably use a web application like
Gerrithttp://code.google.com/p/gerrit/for doing code-review, so not really
a need for any Anroid-Git there.
[...]
GitHub
My understanding is that git will handle running git gc for you when
you have a fair amount of stuff it can clear up (I've seen it do this
automatically, personally, but I could be wrong). So even if the
answer is no, it might not be the answer to the question, has 'git
gc' ever been run?
--
You
14 matches
Mail list logo
