[git-users] Re: Git says there are local changes, but there are no changes. (Windows)

2016-03-12 Thread Ben Page
in git for windows. On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 12:34:32 PM UTC-6, Ben Page wrote: > > I have a couple repos that routinely believe there are local changes, when > there are none. The only solution seems to be to delete these files > and reacquire them from git. > > For exampl

Re: [git-users] Git says there are local changes, but there are no changes. (Windows)

2016-03-12 Thread Ben Page
No, you do not. On Friday, March 11, 2016 at 1:55:27 AM UTC-6, tombert wrote: > > you need to do a "git checkout ." in order to overwrite local changes > (note the dot after the checkout command). > > On Friday, 4 March 2016 22:05:19 UTC+1, Ben Page wrote: >

Re: [git-users] Git says there are local changes, but there are no changes. (Windows)

2016-03-04 Thread Ben Page
? On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 10:03:24 AM UTC-6, Dale R. Worley wrote: > > Ben Page <ben@openreign.com > writes: > >>git status > > On branch master > > Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 2 commits, and can be > > fast-forwarded. >

[git-users] Git says there are local changes, but there are no changes. (Windows)

2016-02-23 Thread Ben Page
I have a couple repos that routinely believe there are local changes, when there are none. The only solution seems to be to delete these files and reacquire them from git. For example: >git status On branch master Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 2 commits, and can be fast-forwarded.