again in other words, i want main to now contain all changes from A and B
and i want to use only main from now on
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
the purpose for me is, i no longer want to commit in A or B only Main but
i want the old history to survive
thank you i will read the doc
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:12:26 AM UTC+1, HWSWMAN wrote:
I have a directory ./MAIN/ with /A/ and /B/ under MAIN
./MAIN/
./MAIN/A/
./MAIN/B/
A and B have their own repos
the purpose for me is, i no longer want to commit in A or B only Main but i
want the old history to survive for those ... it looks like if i do this, A
and B will still be indepwndant repos, which is ok, but say i make anchange
to A or B , will i see the change in main and can i commit it to main,
think manufacturing real things
production manufacturing needs only to read, and they should never push,
they read the data and program units for manufacturing
developers need the whole thing of course
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
From:
... and git will put back the old files?
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:55 PM, William Seiti Mizuta
william.miz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hwswman,
I don't use SourceTree, but I know how to you do it in command line: if
you want to delete forever the changes you have done, you need to get the
, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
... and git will put back the old files?
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:55 PM, William Seiti Mizuta
william.miz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hwswman,
I don't use SourceTree, but I know how to you do it in command line: if
you want
If I want to use GIT to keep track of source code and documents, and use
the tag feature to mark revisions ... suppose now developers commit version
1.0 to the repo .. now day to day they make changes, testers test, etc ..
now what if someone wanted to go in and grab the last tagged version, the
, so they can connect to the subfolders but
not the main folder?
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
If I setup a bare repo, and all developers track their changes, all is
good .. but then one developer makes a bunch of changes that were not
tracked
interesting though thank you
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013, Dale R. Worley wrote:
From: HWSWMAN ed.pat...@gmail.com javascript:;
If I create a git repo for multiple projects, for example ALL projects
that
my team works on, when they clone and pull, do they have to download all
the files?
OK thank you ... i like the island idea i will have to look into that
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:44 PM, John McKown
john.archie.mck...@gmail.comwrote:
That is part of the design of git. It is a _distributed_ system. Perhaps
what you really want would be something like Subversion, in which a
words, does every developer have to
have an entire copy of the server, or can we all just have the copies we
work on and GIT still track the whole thing as one thing?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
So suppose i have a git repo setup, and someone adds a file
Gergely
you said Again, you can only do this if you don't need the source files to
be present on the server, or you can clone it to a separate directory to
access, test or serve them. ...
I do not understand this .. why cant the files be on the server? I have a
std web server with web files ...
. It should be different.
Tag your releases. Use git archive to make release tarballs. Then
push them in the production server for deployment. You can write
scripts which can automate the whole process.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
Gergely
you said Again
deployment strategy should not be
based on git. It should be different.
Tag your releases. Use git archive to make release tarballs. Then
push them in the production server for deployment. You can write
scripts which can automate the whole process.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat
Thank you .. question: I created a git repo on the server ...
than on my machine i cloned the repo
i made some changes, stage, commit, then push ... it says master is checked
out?
Should I have made a branch first? Why can I not push these changes?
How should I push them, or what is the
I made a new branch, made changes, commited, pushed .. all good .. why did
the file not ftp to the server?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you .. question: I created a git repo on the server ...
than on my machine i cloned the repo
i made some
Thank you, I did try this but I was confused ...
The files are on the server, these are the production files .. they have to
be there or there is no website ... so can i still use a bare repo? My
understanding of this is that a bare repo simply has the history info
(branches, commits, etc) ..
ok about the usernames, in general yes i know this is not ideal .. it just
happened this way because the developers needed SSH access to everything
essentially so they could mess with things that needed full control ... i
think because the ssh password on the server is locked to one single ftp
ok i have to try this thank you
ed
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.eduwrote:
Generally, for simple projects with multiple developers, the pattern
is to have one central bare repository that is the official copy
of all the commits.
Each developer then has
the downside of this seems to be that all the developers/contributors have
to know how to merge correctly
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
ok i have to try this thank you
ed
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.eduwrote
.. but if someone simply goes in by ftp and modifies files, then
git has no control over that .. is this correct?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
the downside of this seems to be that all the developers/contributors have
to know how to merge correctly
in Windows.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I am concerned about is that it seems like there is no
protection from someone in via ftp and changing files .. i assumed that
version control meant that the files are protected .. why doesn't git
on
this ??? i have never seen this in 5 years of using this computer
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
From: Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com
One thing I am concerned about is that it seems like there is no
protection
from someone in via ftp
.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
So you are saying that there is no way to rollback to an old version
using git? what is the point then, just to store a bunch of comments?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, John McKown
john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote
finally got the CLR error fixed, here is the fix:
https://github.com/Windower/Issues/issues/170
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you ... about git add i thought once you add the file you never
have to do that again? ... doesn't add tell git to track
it up that way) and other things.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Ed Pataky ed.pat...@gmail.com wrote:
So you are saying that there is no way to rollback to an old version
using git? what is the point then, just to store a bunch of comments?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, John McKown
26 matches
Mail list logo
