On Sunday, 11 March 2012 14:04:32 UTC, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
>
> Just replace the branch with a tag (possibly annotated).
> The "trick" is that tags point to lines of history, just like branches,
> but they don't move. There's no problem with using tags to refer to
> history--be it `git diff
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Mark Liversedge wrote:
> I have a branch on github that was used for development for the last
> 18 months, but it has now been merged back into master.
>
> I will be removing it shortly, but am keeping it just in case
> anything odd crops up, or folks hav
On 11/03/12 Mark Liversedge said:
> Hi,
>
> I have a branch on github that was used for development for the last 18
> months, but it has now been merged back into master.
>
> I will be removing it shortly, but am keeping it just in case anything odd
> crops up, or folks have local versions the
Hi,
I have a branch on github that was used for development for the last 18
months, but it has now been merged back into master.
I will be removing it shortly, but am keeping it just in case anything odd
crops up, or folks have local versions they are working against and submit
a patch in the
