[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2014-03-24 Thread Shankar Ram
Hi, I had done a migration from svn to git until svn revision r. After that, I had some pure git commits. In the meantime the svn repo was also active and there are a bunch of commits on svn too (revision x). Now, my question is how to take these commits in the git repo? Apologies if my quest

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:57:17 PM UTC+1, dmprantz wrote: > Quick update on the nonexistent reg issue. Removing the depth flag didn't > resolve the issue, just delayed it. The full output is this: > > C:\git>git clone file:server/git/Pushed.git Pushed > Cloning into 'Pushed'... > re

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread dmprantz
Quick update on the nonexistent reg issue. Removing the depth flag didn't resolve the issue, just delayed it. The full output is this: C:\git>git clone file:server/git/Pushed.git Pushed Cloning into 'Pushed'... remote: Counting objects: 90813, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (22899/

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread dmprantz
Sorry in advance if this is a duplicate post. Thanks for all the help. Is this something to be concerned about or can be explained? I've been trying to clone both new repositories locally using UNC paths, and both failed. sometimes after over an hour, and apparently there is no resume feature

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:52:49 PM UTC+1, dmprantz wrote: > Things look good, but I have a few questions/comments. What I've done so > far since reading the responses and links: > > I removed "empty" commits with this command: > > git filter-branch --prune-empty --tag-name-filter cat -- -

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread dmprantz
Things look good, but I have a few questions/comments. What I've done so far since reading the responses and links: I removed "empty" commits with this command: git filter-branch --prune-empty --tag-name-filter cat -- --all I then created a shell script with the following and ran it to create

Re: [git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Coarr, Matt
I have found the svn2git command quite helpful. It's a ruby wrapper that provides some easy to work with configuration options and sanity checks. https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git Here's the readme/quickstart documentation: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git/blob/master/README.markdown The

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Daniel Pomerantz
Thank You Thomas, As Tim pointed out, I did use the -s switch to indicate that I used the "standard" svn layout. I would have thought that using that switch and the meta-data in svn which indicates the source rev of each item in the "tags" directory, that git-svn would be able to apply a tag w

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:42:45 PM UTC+1, Tim Chase wrote: > > Just for the record, Daniel *is* using "-s" to get the stdlayout as > you yourself use: > Oh yes, now I see it! Was a bit perplexed by that :) --

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Tim Chase
On 12/20/12 02:22, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote: > On Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:35:56 AM UTC+1, Daniel Pomerantz wrote: >> git svn clone --authors-file=users.txt --no-metadata -s >> > > Any reason why you are not using the --stdlayout argument? This is key for > converting a standard lay

[git-users] Re: git - svn migration question

2012-12-20 Thread Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:35:56 AM UTC+1, Daniel Pomerantz wrote: > I have what is probably a silly question. They are not silly :) > Short background: I hate SVN and finally got my boss to agree to move to > git, if I can make him happy with it. I started looking at migrating tod