So looking up on Google and the various hits, "git triangular workflow", I saw several different articles describing several different methods, all rather old articles.
What is the "best" current practices, with the features in current git, to support the "triangular" workflow consisting of: 1. A "master" public version and repository. 2. A personal version and repository. 3. Being able to send pull requests to the "authority" repository. Bonus points for handling (kinda important): 1. Local base changes needed to run on local system, that will *NOT* be pushed. (Examples: changing a base URL to my address instead of the official address. Changing a list of changelog text entries that describe what I've done differently.) ... actually, that's the biggest obstacle I have -- once I've managed to get my "base changes needed to run", I can't make clean pull requests. ... Which tells me that I'm probably not doing the first 3 steps correctly, as this has to be common enough for someone else to have solved this. Right? --- This message was composed with the aid of a laptop cat, and no mouse -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/F810A673-0AE3-4D4E-8226-0E1F246E7F31%40gmail.com.
