Hi David,
On 2013-06-13 14:12, David Gudeman wrote:
> [...]
> don't think); I'm confused about what the point is. As far as I can
> tell, rebase is just the same as doing a merge and then throwing away
> some history. Why throw away the history? All of the documentation I
That's not what rebase
From: David Gudeman
To: git-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Philip Oakley
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [git-users] what is the point of rebase?
Thanks for taking the time for such a detailed reply, Philip, but everything
you say seems to be true of merge as well so
ne 13, 2013 12:31:07 PM UTC-7, Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> *From:* David Gdeman
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:12 PM
> *Subject:* [git-users] what is the point of rebase?
>
> I've been getting to know git recently as part of some work I needed to
> do, and I love the ea
From: David Gudeman
To: git-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:12 PM
Subject: [git-users] what is the point of rebase?
I've been getting to know git recently as part of some work I needed to do,
and I love the easy branching and merging, but I have to admit
I've been getting to know git recently as part of some work I needed to do,
and I love the easy branching and merging, but I have to admit that rebase
is confusing me. I'm not confused about what it does (I don't think); I'm
confused about what the point is. As far as I can tell, rebase is just
