On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:42:26 +
Philip Oakley wrote:
[...]
> Hi, yes, I was really wanting to hack on the latest version. I've
> done a bit on the Msysgit version before, but to get at the Git core
> code it looks like working on Linux would be the best approach. So
> I'm trying to jump across
On Monday, February 4, 2013 12:36:17 AM UTC+1, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:07:05PM -0800, Vicente Davila wrote:
>
> > Why GIT is much better tha SVN or CVS ?
>
> http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/
>
> (To all the other subscribers: the post is obvious trolling so I wou
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 05:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote:
> > > Why GIT is much better tha SVN or CVS ?
> >
> > http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/
> >
> > (To all the other subscribers: the post is obvious trolling so I
> > would advise to refrain from attempts to answer it construct
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 03:52:51 -0800 (PST)
martin mangard wrote:
> I use various versions of the linux kernel which I compile from
> source. I decided to get rid of all my source tar-balls and clone the
> git repository of the linux kernel.
> http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds
Hello Konstantin,
thank you for your answer. Yes I have exactly the same problem as
discussed on stackoverflow but I haven't found a solution yet.
If I print the log of the Toplevel- Makefile which defines the version
information I only see 2 two commits between "Linux 2.6.31-rc1" and
"Linux 2.6.3
From: "Konstantin Khomoutov"
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 9:47 AM
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:42:26 +
Philip Oakley wrote:
[...]
Hi, yes, I was really wanting to hack on the latest version. I've
done a bit on the Msysgit version before, but to get at the Git core
code it looks like working
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:02:58PM -0500, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> > From: Tristan Stanic
> >
> > What is the reason the git developers use obscure syntax? This make the git
> > learning curve uselessly complex.
>
> My belief is that the system grew over time, with many people using it
> well be
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:53:55PM +0100, martin mangard wrote:
[...]
> >> I am new to git and somehow lost in this big repository. What are the
> >> right techniques to checkout/find version 2.6.30.10 in this
> >> repository?
> >
> > See http://stackoverflow.com/a/11605138/720999
>
> thank you f