From: "Michael"
I don't understand this last statement. Perhaps a graph showing the
arrangement may help de-confuse which are 'off of' and which are 'on
to'.
Sure; how to generate that graph?
I just use plain text, left to right, A B C for commits, - / \ for the
That looks "good" (aka effective but long).
Good to see your request on the git@gver list.
Jeff is one of the main coders @ github, so it's a worthwhile reply.
regards
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Connolly
To: Philip Oakley ; git-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday,
From: "Philip Oakley"
From: "Michael"
I don't understand this last statement. Perhaps a graph showing the
arrangement may help de-confuse which are 'off of' and which are 'on
to'.
Sure; how to generate that graph?
I just use plain text, left to
Hi experts
I want to know the branch creation time, any help ( I don't have master
branch)
Lei
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On 2015-09-11, at 12:43 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Philip Oakley"
>> From: "Michael"
I don't understand this last statement. Perhaps a graph showing the
arrangement may help de-confuse which are 'off of' and
Well that was interesting, but --first-parent does not do what you'd expect
on git blame.
I was able to construct a command sequence to do what I want though:
git rev-list --first-parent HEAD | awk '{print p " " $0}{p=$0}' >
tmpfile && git blame -b -S tmpfile HEAD -- path && rm tmpfile
On Thu,
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:03:01 +0800
lei yang wrote:
> I want to know the branch creation time, any help ( I don't have
> master branch)
This information is not stored anywhere in any form.
The closest approximation of it you can get is the commit time of the
first commit