I have post an question
at
http://superuser.com/questions/962861/how-to-use-git-to-commit-read-only-file
I just want to know why GIT doesn't track read/write permission?
What I want is just GIT keep what every I checked in? ( I am OK with the
executable permission control)
--
You received t
I think git track executable permission, right?
If so, files in git is "read only" and "not deployment too", why it track
"x" permission?
Keep "read only" permission is useful in some scenario. And most important
thing is there's on harm to keep it (I am not a software developer, correct
me if
tform) to make
sure selected files in repo are read-only after GIT operations (pull,
merge, clone .etc) automatically?
Thanks.
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 11:53:55 AM UTC+10, charlesmanning wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Enzo Chi > wrote:
>
>> I
