Hello,
You only have to initialize your project root, and add files in them with
git add css/main.css
Best,
Gergely
On 5 February 2013 14:34, Jamna Vyas vyas.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Few days back i started to learn about git , so* i m very beginner for
git and i never used any kind
If you are familiar with symlinks under Linux, you can think of submodules
as such. You add a reference to another git repository, check it out to a
subdirectory, and you are done. The Git book has a chapter on it:
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules
On 27 February 2013 23:21, Ben
Sorry, I wasn't totally clear. Forgive me as I'm in the middle of a bad flu
:)
As Ryan says, hosting both the monolithic stuff AND the modules can be
dangerous, unless the modules are actually independent. The Symfony
project, for example, hosts the whole framework in a large github repo, and
Both --track and --set-upstream-to operates on the current branch. The
thing you need is:
--track origin/master
or
--set-upstream-to=origin/master
Gergely
On 4 March 2013 18:21, FlashBurn rail.shafigu...@gmail.com wrote:
I committed some changes to my repository at home and then I tried to
That depends on your IDE. E.g. Netbeans cat store the project (IDE) files
in a separate directory, and as I remember, Eclipse can do the same.
On 22 March 2013 23:22, Ram Rachum ram.rac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
Here's a problem I had to deal with many times. I'm hoping someone here
the
IDE's powers :)
On 22 March 2013 23:47, Ram Rachum r...@rachum.com wrote:
Gergerly, that doesn't solve my problem. I want the files to be saved for
me to be able to use them on any computer in which I work on the repo.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Gergely Polonkai
gerg
March 2013 00:28, Ram Rachum r...@rachum.com wrote:
And this will be more convenient than a submodule?
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.euwrote:
If you manage to store them in a different directory, it will be easy to
manage them in a your own repository. E.g
As Excel files are binary (from git's point of view), merging will be kind
of pain I think. Otherwise it's not a bad idea. There is even a tool called
SparkleShare for such tasks.
On 27 Apr 2013 20:40, Alex alevg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
I like git very much as version control system
Hello,
gitk is a repository browser. To create/modify commits, use git gui.
I personally use these two tools, and Rabbit VCS (rabbitvcs.org as I
recall), which integrates well with the most popular file managers.
Best,
Gergely
On 17 May 2013 00:33, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Hello,
git doesn't provide such thing by default. To achieve that, you should use
external software, like gitosis or gitolite.
Best,
Gergely
On 7 Jun 2013 00:42, benoît person benoit.per...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
From what I know, git does not support branch permissions. The best
way to deal
Hello Lingfei,
as Git doesn't store anything about the absolute path of the repository
(only stuff under the directory containing the .git directory counts), you
don't have to do anything else but the move on the server side. Of course,
if the developers set it up like user@gitserver:/opt/git,
Hello,
if I was you, I would use a bare repository on the server side. This will
render the server's repository unreadable for the human eye, but the
server-side merging would become unnecessary. To do this, create a new
directory on the server, and issue the command
git init --bare
in it.
Hello,
do I get it right, and you have only two repos, one on the linux and one on
the windows machine, and you don't use an intermittent repository, like a
git server, Gitorious or Github? If so, you MUST commit or stash your
changes in origin, before pushing your changes there. Or, you may set
@John McKown, `git stash` can be rewerted with `git stash pop`, so it
cleans up the working directory only temporarily. So it does just what it
says it will do: put your changes in a stash.
On 2 July 2013 14:55, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
Dang it, don't do the git stash at
On 8 Jul 2013 16:44, leam hall leamh...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, newbie question. Organization Foo has developers Sam, Fred, and
Guido. The org clones Project X and over time realizes their own branch
needs to be separate from the project for a while. Sam, Fred, and Guido
each branch their code
On 2 Aug 2013 23:02, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
From: Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen tfn...@gmail.com
My general environment is Fedora Linux, using the X Windows system. I
use vtwm as a window manager, so I don't have all the
KDE/Gnome/whatever accessories. Much of my work
Hello,
git itself is not capable of authentication and authorization, you will
need a separate software for that. I personally use gitosis, but many
others exist out there. This kind of software is needed only on the
server side, clients can still use good old git client.
Best,
Gergely
On 16 Aug
Hello,
out of the solutions provided by the Stack Overflow article (mentioned by
Thomas), I would definitely choose git-bundle. That is the safest way, as
the only thing you will need to know is the last commit you have in the
other repository. See [1], the EXAMPLES section holds some good, well,
the repo to a private folder, if
possible. E.g. take a pendrive with you, do a git clone to clone the read
only repo into a folder on it, and periodically do a git pull when you are
around again.
On 26 Aug 2013 11:04, shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com wrote:
@Gergely Polonkai I read the bit about
On 26 Aug 2013 21:53, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
From: Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net
2) I dislike defaulting to using a pager
I think you're a part of a minority in this case -- when you work with
Git in a shell, having to append | mypetpager
Although I haven't used it myself, your life would be easier with
libgit[1]. It implements most core features, so it might help you (or you
may be qble to pick some parts of it).
[1] http://libgit2.github.com
On 26 Aug 2013 23:22, Boris Trivic trivu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone.
I am
The second one is obviously from SSH. Can you simply do ssh
gitolite@172.27.0.221 ?
On 27 Aug 2013 09:59, Володимир Кулик cdrwvova1...@gmail.com wrote:
parf@parf:~/work$ git remote add frontend.epass gitolite@172.27.0.221
fatal: remote frontend.epass already exists.
fatal:
So the SSH part is all right. In this case, you should check gitolite's
logs maybe.
On 27 Aug 2013 10:08, Володимир Кулик cdrwvova1...@gmail.com wrote:
The second one is obviously from SSH. Can you simply do ssh
gito...@172.27.0.221 ?
parf@parf:~/work$ ssh gitolite@172.27.0.221
PTY
There was a tutorial'ish post here on the list a few days ago about named
remotes. If you clone a remote repository, a named remote is created,
called origin, and your local master (or whatever) branch is set to track
origin/master.
Now if you change origin's URL (git remote --set-url
Hello,
braches hold only commited changes (actually, they are pointers to one
specific commit). Uncommited changes travel between checkouts (well,
unless the target branch is in a totally different state, as then you will
face even stranger merge issues). So take this advise: never checkout
I can't try it until afternoon, but isn't it enough to pass -e tags after
-xfd? From the --help snippet it seems so.
On 4 Sep 2013 06:34, dexter ietf dexter.i...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:07:06 PM UTC+5:30, William Seiti Mizuta
wrote:
Hi Dexter,
you are using option
Cherry picking is your friend here. The easiest way maybe if you add the
bug fixing two lines as a separate commit. This way you will only have to
cherry pick that only commit. Otherwise, you may add -n to git-cherrypick,
so it won't commit the cherry picked commit instantly, but let you
UTC+2, Gergely Polonkai wrote:
Cherry picking is your friend here. The easiest way maybe if you add the
bug fixing two lines as a separate commit. This way you will only have to
cherry pick that only commit. Otherwise, you may add -n to git-cherrypick,
so it won't commit the cherry picked
On 19 Sep 2013 14:39, Gabriel Marchesan Almeida
gabrielmarche...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer Thomas,
However this is not what I am looking for.
git-submodules is nice when you have stable components or third party
libraries where you can easily choose the version you want to
Hello,
how about this?
git fetch origin hotfix.module-xxx
git checkout -b hotfix.module-xxx origin/hotfix.module-xxx
(compile, test, whatever)
git checkout master
Maybe there's a shorthand for fetch checkout -b. I'm not behind git
--help right now to check. It worked for me several times this
Although totally independent from Git itself, I think this is the point
where shared libraries come in to the picture.
For example, you may want to outsource the common work to a shared
library, and maybe add this library either as a compile time dependency, or
as a git-subtree; both would mean
Hello,
first of all, Fred should stop using such commit messages :-)
Seriously speaking, I think that's where git rebase -i comes in. Before
pushing, rebase on the last public commit, and edit/squash the unnecessary
commits.
Cheers,
Gergely
On 26 Sep 2013 04:19, Tom Roche tom_ro...@pobox.com
Hello,
The point is to rebase before pushing, thus, only rearrange/edit only the
commits that haven't gone public yet. Rebasing is only a bad idea if you do
it with already pushed commits.
The other use case is rebase on pull. If your upstream changes while you
develop your own code, do a git
Hello,
Another approach is to try to rebase X on master. The following works only
if branch X was created from master.
$ git checkout X
$ git rebase master
As you mentioned, X is a refactored version, it is more than likely that
you will encounter merge conflicts during the process. However, if
master is actually just a pointer to a commit (”hash in your terms), in
your case, to aaa. So if you switch to another commit (git checkout eee),
you can no longer be on master (aaa). You can git-reset, if you don't need
aaa's changes any more, but bare in mind that it can mess up things if you
Hello,
according to your description, your project seems to be something like the
Linux kernel, and Git handles that just fine. Depending on your build
environment, Git branches may help you a lot, as, if it is designed well,
can prevent full rebuilds.
Cheers,
Gergely
On 19 Oct 2013 23:40, Blake
How about mixing your current solution with Git(Hub)?
As I undurstand, your entire repository is kept on Dropbox. If you have
your CMS files ignored, it doesn't pollute your own code (that, your Git
repo), so I don't see what else would you want to achieve. Unless you want
to eliminate Dropbox
Hello,
I know it was on topic several times before, but today this problem also
came to me.
I have a project tracked by git, which contained source code for both a
binary and a library. The library had several relatively large (~30 MB
each, ~400 MX total) data files, which were generated by an
My first guess is that you haven't updated your local repository from
GitHub. Have you issued git pull before viewing your local log?
On 15 November 2013 11:28, nanna nanna.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I would like to list out the commit comment given on github from command
line.
Is it
Hello,
at step 4 I would do a rebase instead of a merge. This way when you merge
your local changes to master in step 6, you can do an interactive rebase,
and squash all your local commits into one general commit. I don’t see your
problem though, why is it a problem that your changes appear as
Hello,
I don't know of any method built into git, but how about denying commits
that modify the .gitignore file(s)? This way your hook must only check if
the commit has modifications to any files called .gitignore.
Cheers,
Gergely
On 31 January 2014 08:25, Philipp Kraus
Hello,
there is a project called libgit (maybe libgit2?). However, it is not part
of Git, it is totally independent (from development's view).
Cheers,
Gergely
On 14 February 2014 21:27, mareb mrebenti...@comparat.de wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to use a git library? I found no lib on my
Hello,
I personally use one repository per application/library (and use submodules
if an application needs a particular library). All these repos sit on the
same one server, and I use gitosis to manage access to them (others may
prefer gitolite).
Cheers,
Gergely
On 24 February 2014 22:48,
As far as I remember, you have to use git rm -r for that (-r stands for
recursive); but without my machine at home/at work, I'm not 100% sure yet.
On 12 March 2014 04:43, lgp8...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to rm a directory from the repository. I use git rm dirname, but
it didn't work. Somebody
Try removing the directory with rmdir newDirectory (without git). If that
fails, newDirectory is obviously not empty. In that case you should check
the contents of the dir with ls -la newDirectory, and/or remove it with
rm -rf newDirectory.
Cheers,
Gergely
On 26 March 2014 02:00, Michael Laird
That tutorial also have an aliases section at [1]. According to that, `git
hist` is actually
git log --pretty=format:%h %ad | %s%d [%an] --graph --date=short
[1] http://githowto.com/aliases/
On 31 March 2014 12:06, Ashutosh Das areos...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any working tutorial for
Another common practise for release naming is the usage of tags. In my
projects, for example, I have several tags like v1.0.0, v2.4.2 and such.
On 21 Apr 2014 14:53, Simon Joseph Aquilina saquilina...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for your reply. Reading your reply make me think that
Hello,
I’m trying to clone an SVN repository with around 48000 revisions,
several branches and tags (svn://svn.zabbix.com). After a few
thousands commits, Git failed (complaining something about sed, I
haven’t wrote that down), so I svnrdumped the whole repository onto my
filesystem.
After that,
in the evening (CEST).
On 29 Apr 2014 12:32, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:16:40 +0200
Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.eu wrote:
I’m trying to clone an SVN repository with around 48000 revisions,
several branches and tags (svn
Hello,
you are using a non-bare repository on the remote side. Such repositories
always have a branch checked out (read: the contents of its commits are
written to actual files on the disk). On the other side, bare repositories
are just that: bare. This means that they store all commits, but not
You must first create an empty repository on Z:, add it as a remote in
C:\mydir, then issue the git push. Basically as follows, although I
don’t know how Windows git handles backslashes in paths, so maybe you
will have to replace it wich slashes:
C:\mydir Z:
Z:\ mkdir projectname
Z:\ cd
Now that we know this, git-bisect is exactly the tool he needs! He
specifies the last known commit without the bug, and the first known commit
with the bug. Git will then choose intermediate commits for you to test if
the bug still exists, and point you to the first bad one.
Hope that helps.
On
git-ls-tree prints the blob’s (file’s) hash. It has nothing to do with
a commit, which has its own hash (as you have already noticed).
As far as I can get, your boss needs a commit hash, as he wants to
know who and when introduced the bug. For that, you can even use
git-bisect (as I suggested
Trying to make things a bit more clean… @John Fisher, you (and maybe
your boss) might want to read [1] which somewhat explains git’s
private parts, and how exactly it works. Not the most complete list
(to be honest, I’ve seen a better one *somewhere*, I just lost the
link :( Anyways, I hope it
The only question that came into my mind if the pull you issued caused
any merge problems?
On 10 July 2014 23:25, Dale R. Worley wor...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I'm hardly an expert, but what I see for the description of the 9:11
commit (5f5345a) is Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com...;.
I haven't used Ubuntu in a while, but a few years ago it was called
git-core, not git.
On 17 Jul 2014 11:54, Ellick Marquez ellick.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I want to install git on my computer with ubuntu 12.04 but when I put the
next code sudo apt-get install git on my terminal,
Hello,
I have a fresh repository, with only three commits. I made a mistake, as
the first two commits should be one. Normally I would do that with an
interactive rebase, but in this case I cannot use origin/master (as there
are no remotes yet), neither HEAD^^^ as it refers to no commits (I cannot
Thank you, this option slipped my eye at 1am somehow :-)
On 23 Jul 2014 08:03, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 3:44:15 AM UTC+4, Gergely Polonkai wrote:
I have a fresh repository, with only three commits. I made a mistake, as
the first
Hello,
this, actually, depends more on your project size. I successfully run Git
on really old machines, like things RHEL itself doesn't support any more. I
have an old Geode processor machine with 128MB RAM, and Git runs fine on
it. It is also insalled and doing well on my Raspberry Pi, with
Also make sure that your patch actually can be applied to HEAD by doing ie.
a git pull --rebase or similar.
On 3 Aug 2014 02:10, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote:
*From:* Sreepathi Prasanna prasanna.sreepa...@gmail.com
*To:* git-users@googlegroups.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 02,
Hello,
I have two branches, master and table, both went through some changes and
have their respective tracking brances:
M1! - M2! - M3!
\
\-T1! - T2! - T3 - T4
commits marked with ! are pushed upstream. I'd like to merge master into
table, and rebase my local commits (T3 and T4) on top of
.
On 3 Aug 2014 17:00, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote:
*From:* Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.eu
*To:* git-users@googlegroups.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 03, 2014 2:09 PM
*Subject:* [git-users] Merge+rebase diverged branches
Hello,
I have two branches, master and table, both
myself a challenge.
On 4 Aug 2014 11:06, Gunnar Strand gunnar.str...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi Gergely,
On 08/03/14 17:46, Gergely Polonkai wrote:
Thank you for your advice, Philip!
Table, in this case, is a new major feature in the app, and parts of that
feature are already pushed to get feedback
Hello,
if I understand well, you just issued `git init` through the GUI. Note that
git init doesn't add/commit any of your files, just creates an empty
repository. You may check it with `git log` (maybe it is called History in
the GUI, but I might confuse it with SVN). You should add and commit
Hello,
I have a somewhat clean history:
M1 - M2 - M3*
\ - H1 - H2 - H3*
M is branch master, H is a topic branch, each of them point to the commit
marked with the asterisk. Now I want to move master forward only one commit
(others are not ready for publish, and are subject
The information you gave is a bit loosy.
Do you have modifications on A, or everything in A is pushed to BitBucket?
How did you copy your repository from A to B? Did you just copy the
directory, or used git clone to create a second one?
Are you using branches, or everything you do is on master?
On 15 August 2014 21:41, Suh-Shin hwang silen...@gmail.com wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Git for human beings group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
The first thing that comes into my mind is that maybe SELinux is turned on
and the httpd daemon is not allowed to make outbound network connections.
Still, unfortunately, it is more like an OS than a Git problem.
On 17 Aug 2014 20:58, Vaibhav Chauhan vaibhav@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying
git-log comes to the rescue. You can pass --since DATE to git-log, and can
even give a path or file name, too. For example:
git log --since '4 days' src/susp.c
will display every commit in the last 4 day that modified srcsusp.c
On 19 Aug 2014 15:59, Norike Abe nor...@gmail.com wrote:
Excuse me
Hello Brian,
the patch you are getting is actually the difference between L3 and
workbranch (Line3). What you are facing is a conflict resolution: you have
different modifications for the same file; in this case, both master~1 and
workbranch added lines to the test.txt file, and now you have to
Hello,
as far as I remember, Git only stores the executable flag of the
current user. Git is a source management tool (version control
system); what you need here (IMHO) is a deployment tool here, which
Git is not.
Best,
Gergely
On 4 September 2014 10:01, wangfeng wangfeng
You can easily host Git repos using an SSH server and git installed on a
company machine. If you have multiple repos, you may want to look at other
solutions like gitosis. If you need a whole development environment with
code review and such, you might want to take a look at phabricator.
On 5 Sep
The only thing I can come up with is this:
$ git rev-list --max-parents=0 HEAD
It can, though, return more than one result if you have multiple
branches from the initial root (e.g. created with git checkout
--orphan). In usual workflows, this should give you a unique ID.
On 12 September 2014
On 17 Sep 2014 17:29, Dmitry Moscow koktebelnig...@gmail.com wrote:
I come from an SVN background, and I have a hard time grasping Git's
philosophy. In particular, I'm confused by the following.
Imagine I have made some changes in my working dir. If I switch to
another branch, the
First I'd check if I'm pushing to the right remote. What command did you
use to push? Does it include the remote's name? If not, what is the remote
tracking branch of your local branch? Does that point to the remote you are
checking? Did git push have *any* output?
When you cloned to the temp
Hello,
the interface you linked looks to be TortoiseGit
(https://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/) to me, maybe you should
install that, then.
Best,
Gergely
On 20 September 2014 00:23, Joanna Gunst joannagu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Complete newbie here.
I believe I just installed Git on my home
Hello,
this depends on many things, like you agreed workflow (even if you
work alone, you should agree with yourself). There are [1] and [2] as
notable examples.
Basically, I would say yes, you should switch to master (git checkout
master) and merge your changes (git merge your-other-branch).
I guess you were addressing the wrong list with this question. You
should report it to the X-Code support/mailing list/whatever.
Although I’m not a lawyer, my guess is that they are not connected in
any way. Git is one product with its on licence, X-Code is another.
On 22 September 2014 10:46,
offtopic
As far as I know, Git is licensed under the GNU GPL v2.0. Stock git
never tells you to accept its licence, though. This seems to be a
legal issue for me, as it seems that they are relicensing Git under
their own. Still, this is not in the reach of this list.
/offtopic
On 22 September
That said, it still can be done, although it is not natively supported, you
may do it with some custom tool. By finding the last commit a specific file
was modified in, you may apply the date of the commit to that file.
However, if you have a large repository, looking at this information for
each
...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:51:12 +0200
Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.eu wrote:
That said, it still can be done, although it is not natively
supported, you may do it with some custom tool. By finding the last
commit a specific file was modified in, you may apply
I’m not familiar with the kernel sources. If the Makefile is part of the
git tree, you can commit your changes and always do a git pull --rebase
when you need the new changes. If not (Makefile is generated somehow), then
you have to create some automation that changes that line (like a sed
script
This is a bit misleading… it actually requires cpanm, mojolicious legacy,
and so on (which, well, come bundled, but still).
The project itself looks really promising, it just needs a bit love here
and there. I’ll definitely take a deeper look!
On 20 October 2014 19:59, kanishka.bla...@gmail.com
Hello,
you don't.
Git is decentralised, which means that anyone with access can clone your
repository, and do whatever they want on it: create branches that you will
never see, remove branches you created, really, virtually anything. You
won't know about their changes until they push back to the
I'm not familiar with scratch, but if it saves textual (non binary) files,
then you are good to go!
On 18 Nov 2014 21:49, Lorena Martin lmc2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am new to Git. Can I use it with the programming language Scratch? I am
mentoring someone, and the mentees are supposed to
That's more like an Apache question, not Git-related.
Anyways, is there a reason you can't use 0.0.0.0 or * as the IP address?
That would solve this problem of yours.
On 4 Dec 2014 22:27, Jirong Hu jirong...@gmail.com wrote:
I just figured out I have this in conf.d and the IP address has been
Hello,
the problem with this approach is that upon the next pull, you will get
different commits, so you will have to merge or rebase.
Still, according to the githooks manpage, there is no such hook that
operates before pushing. But you should wait for other people's answer
before taking this as
Git doesn't actually work this way. After you added your file with git add,
you can use git status to check what will be included in your commit. If
you are satisfied with the result, you can do a git commit.
On 12 Dec 2014 17:21, scls s.cel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to Git so please
If I have to make a guess, it may be a memory issue. Both devices you
mention has a very limited amount of RAM.
Maybe you should try git push --verbose, so Git will report a bit more
things to you.
On 18 Feb 2015 19:21, Aaron Dennis akden...@gmail.com wrote:
As with WD, I am experiencing the
It's a bit unclear for me what you exactly did. Could you paste the output
of your failing commands, please?
On 18 Feb 2015 19:21, Howard Miller howardsmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Went like this...
- I have a project in git working with no issues
- I added a bunch of code in a subdirectory not
Hello,
I would create a release branch (as suggested by Philip). After this, you
fix the bug on either master or version-1.0, and cherry-pick the change to
every other branches. This way you can close version-1.0 branch after a
maintenance period (like by telling your customer that sorry, we no
Hello,
Nelson is just right about git rm, except it does nothing with untracked
files. What you may have done is git clean -x which removes all files
unknown to Git (even untracked ones). In this case you are on your own and
try some file system utilities, if any, to recover your files.
Best,
Hello,
I have no `man` at hand to check this, but as I remember, if you ignore
those files (put them in .gitignore or .git/info/exclude), git won't
complain about them.
However, if you have already added those files in an old commit, you will
have to remove them on each branch
Best,
Gergely
On
Hello,
if both parties are using Git, maybe you should go with git-format-patch,
while the other side can use git-am.
Best,
Gergely
On 16 Mar 2015 15:03, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Raluca Popa typsy1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Git, in itself, doesn't support authentication/authorization, or users in
any sense. There are, however, several applications that can do it for you,
the most known may be gitolite.
Best,
Gergely
On 10 Mar 2015 01:44, William Lasiewicz lasiew...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best way to
Hello,
this is because checkout -b sets up a so called tracking branch. Tracking
branches, among other things, have a feature that whenever you do a git
push, the commits on your local branch will be pushed to the tracking
remote; in your case, to origin/master.
What you should do is to ask Git
Gergely! I am wondering how can we log pushes and
whether push logs will contain details about 'git reset'. Can you please
help me with the command (not the exact syntax) or some link which i can
refer to, to implement logging for pushes?
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Gergely Polonkai gerg
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.eu
wrote:
Logging pushes is a bit tricky, as push such operation doesn't have an
associated user record (ie. pushes don't have authors nor committers).
If your developers use different user accounts for pushing
-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-Internals
[2]
http://strk.keybit.net/blog/2011/06/07/getting-just-the-tip-of-a-remote-git-branch/
On 25 Feb 2015 19:42, Michael keybou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-02-24, at 10:40 PM, Gergely Polonkai gerg...@polonkai.eu wrote:
Hello,
yes, basically that is the way
Hello,
if by tedious you mean resolve the same merge conflict multiple times, then
rerere[1] may solve your problem.
If you want to go the way you described, you will have to implement some
client side hooks, which cherry pick your new commits on another branch.
This, however, may introduce
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
