Hey, I'm using git with a gitblit server. Using tickets these days in it.
Basic scenario summary is new ticket #1, started work on it under new branch, made some commits but didn't finish it so no merge. Switched to ticket #2 on another new branch, did work, commits, finished it and pushed and merged into master. Now it's been a few days since I worked on this last but I find myself in ticket #1 again and see I have two files changed (probably renamed them after merging #2) that should have been part of ticket #2 fix/branch but I now have them under ticket/#4. Haven't committed them yet. So just wondering what's best approach here? Only thing I can really think of is copy the files, checkout the files again in my ticket #1 so they are unchanged in it, commit those, switch to master, copy back the changes and commit & push with message about what they're for. Only reason asking is I've found there tends to always be some less than obvious 'better way' of doing things like this with git that doesn't involve manually copying files. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
