Re: [git-users] Adding directories

2015-03-16 Thread Philip Oakley
From: Rustom Mody 
  Hi

  Context is we're using git for collectively editing documents(mostly text ie 
not Word etc).

  Sharing is on bitbucket.

  There are also largish reference-docs -- downloaded pdfs etc that are 
referenced but not ours -- dont want these in the repo.


  So...

  If I make a .gitignore that contains the 'downloads' directory, then the 
contents of downloads is of course ignored but also downloads itself.

  Making .gitignore contain downloads/* does not add downloads.

  Finally I added a dummy-file to downloads; add-commited it and then ignored 
downloads.


  Seems convoluted and unsure (to me).

  Is there a better way?

The other alternative is to make that  'downloads' directory a sub-module, i.e. 
an independent reference repository. That way, they (users) only neeed to get 
it once and it stays valid, and it isn't part of the main repo. 

As long as the reference is glacial, then the 'hassles' that some report for 
the confusions when using sub-modules essentially go away.

Philip

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [git-users] Adding directories

2015-03-16 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:07:16 +0530
Rustom Mody  wrote:

[...]
> Finally I added a dummy-file to downloads; add-commited it and then
> ignored downloads.
> 
> Seems convoluted and unsure (to me).
> Is there a better way?

No, there isn't.  Git does not track directories directly -- only as a
byproduct of adding files contained in them.  So either do what you did
or, possibly better, add a script to your repository which, when
called, will create this directory locally.  The reasoning behind this:
Git is not a deployment/configuration system but rather a content
management solution with "content" being defined as whatever is
contained in the files being managed.  From this PoV, having an ability
to put a sole directory under version control has no sense as it does
not represent content but rather a workplace configuration orthogonal
to the repository's content.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[git-users] Adding directories

2015-03-16 Thread Rustom Mody
Hi

Context is we're using git for collectively editing documents(mostly text
ie not Word etc).
Sharing is on bitbucket.
There are also largish reference-docs -- downloaded pdfs etc that are
referenced but not ours -- dont want these in the repo.

So...

If I make a .gitignore that contains the 'downloads' directory, then the
contents of downloads is of course ignored but also downloads itself.
Making .gitignore contain downloads/* does not add downloads.
Finally I added a dummy-file to downloads; add-commited it and then ignored
downloads.

Seems convoluted and unsure (to me).
Is there a better way?

Rusi

-- 

http://blog.languager.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.