Hi All,

I've stepped in a company that runs an existing CMS for their main
website. They asked me a while ago to setup 5 new websites with that
CMS. I've decided to have the original as branch MASTER and the other
5 as separate branches.
When I make a feature/bug fix that needs to propagate to all versions,
I create new branch, fix bug, and merge the change to all branches.
Although it works, I don't like the idea of having all different
websites in one repository. I'd rather have 6 different repositories
(each website it's own) and fix bugs separately and merge to all
repositories at the end.
Does that make sense? What model would you prefer?

Thanks, Michal

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to