Going back to file systems seems wrong but it would minimize the effort to get going. I might think about it more and come up with something better.
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:03:35 AM UTC-4, Dale Ross wrote: > > I have an idea that involves partial updates of large data sets from > multiple sources. Pretty much, the content will in most cases preexist and > will be synced with a central repository. I might be barking up the wrong > tree, but I think git might be a good model to replicate. I could fork the > code and prototype the concept but when I'm done it would be used in a > solution if it fits the bill. While writing this post, I'm even seeing how > git could be used without too many changes. > > Nice! This group is awesome! It auto-answers questions even before they're > even submitted. Any advise would be appreciated in any case but the > modified concept I thought about while typing this would more or less be > > Extract existing data to file system with in my expected format, git them > to my git server, automate the insertion to my db from the git server. You > guys rock!!! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
