Or course, it's perfectly sensible to
merge back to a common branch any bugfixes pertaining to it, but I
can't get such accumulate and apply all at once approach. It seems
like a quite contrived approach, whch is invented just because it
could be invented, and not from a real need.
My
Ah, so fetch is an operation on the entire repository and merge is an
operation on a specific branch? So you're say that 'pull'ing each
branch is not necessary because the 'fetch' in 'pull's fetch+merge is
redundant. Is that correct?
I also don't understand why this is a deficient approach? If
On Aug 13, 7:37 pm, David Doria daviddo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so fetch is an operation on the entire repository and merge is an
operation on a specific branch? So you're say that 'pull'ing each
branch is not necessary because the 'fetch' in 'pull's fetch+merge is
redundant. Is that correct?
Wow.. it was that easy.
Then when I update something in Project1, I just do a
|[dor...@localhost AllProjects]$ git pull origin Project1
and AllProjects is now up to date.
Is there any standard way to make a script to pull from a whole
bunch of projects? Or should I just make a bash script with
