On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 04:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Pierre-François CLEMENT wrote:
[...]
> What I do not understand however, is what made you think *treaki*
> needed these explanations in the first place? Don't get me wrong,
> it's no big deal; but I could have asked the same question, and I
> would have ap
Le jeudi 26 juin 2014 13:04:18 UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
> Pierre-François CLEMENT > wrote:
>
> > > The imaginary `git pull-push` has no sense as `git pull` might
> > > legitimately result in a merge conflict. Note that `git pull` is a
>
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Pierre-François CLEMENT wrote:
> > The imaginary `git pull-push` has no sense as `git pull` might
> > legitimately result in a merge conflict. Note that `git pull` is a
> > sort of macro for `git fetch` + `git merge` which just makes
> > certain (rather
Le mercredi 25 juin 2014 13:15:23 UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov a écrit :
> The imaginary `git pull-push` has no sense as `git pull` might
> legitimately result in a merge conflict. Note that `git pull` is a
> sort of macro for `git fetch` + `git merge` which just makes certain
> (rather strong)
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 9:26:50 AM UTC+2, treaki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i am using git with an ssh remote running at my router@home. the most
> times i use it the following way:
>
> git pull
> git push
>
> the problem i see it that he ueses 2 ssh sessions for this job, so i would
> like to ask if
