Technically Git doesn't need a central location, in fact that's the point.
In reality Git is often used with a central repository to share changes but
this is more about administration, enterprise engineering policies, etc.
and to make collaboration a bit easier. This is not a bad list of the ways
in which Git repositories can be shared
http://www.jedi.be/blog/2009/05/06/8-ways-to-share-your-git-repository/
Using a service like Bitbucket (I use that for personal projects and like
it very much), Github, etc. is great if that's a viable option for you. If
you are doing the work for a company that has rules about what you can
store in services like Bitbucket then you may want to consider Atlassian's
Stash product (Atlassian own Bitbucket) or you can go with something free
like Gitblit, Gitosis, etc.
On Thursday, 21 February 2013 14:00:11 UTC, www wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the replies. I am so glad to find bitbucket, which
> provides free service for up to 5 members. It uses mercurial using the tool
> TortoiseHg and git.
>
> I am an experienced subversion user, including TortoiseSvn tool. I think
> we can learn this quickly. This new information is great value to us. Thank
> you so much.
>
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:32:41 PM UTC-5, www wrote:
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>> I have used git for a while, but only for keeping tracking of the changes
>> of my own in my own computer. I have never used git to cooperate with
>> others. My naive question is: if somebody on the other city and me started
>> with the same set files(or code), after a while, he has modified his files,
>> how can I get all his changes to my files by using git?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
