nt: Friday, September 11, 2015 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [git-users] Treat merges as squashed commits in git log/git
blame/gitk etc
Well that was interesting, but --first-parent does not do what you'd expect
on git blame.
I was able to construct a command sequence to do what I want though:
gi
Re: [git-users] Treat merges as squashed commits in git
> log/git blame/gitk etc
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Git for human beings <git-users@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September
- Original Message -
From: Philip Oakley
To: git-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [git-users] Treat merges as squashed commits in git log/git
blame/gitk etc
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Connolly
To: Git
Hi,
At my work and on some of the open source communities that I contribute to,
there is a healthy debate about how to handle merge commits. I can break
this into two camps:
* People who think that when you are merging a change from a pull request,
you should squash all commits immediately