Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-18 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:35:19AM -0800, Daniel Doron wrote: > Thanks Konstantin, that is very thorough information. > I will find the time and formulate a request to Git developers. Yes, please do. As you understood already I got bitten by exactly that issue when looking at your logs. I've

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-17 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:06:19 -0800 (PST) Daniel Doron wrote: > >> > see screen capture here: http://postimg.org/image/esgjyhk9j/ > >> > had to black out some parts because of proprietary info...but I > >> > hope you get the gist. > >> > >> This "remote" stuff seems

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-17 Thread Daniel Doron
Thanks Konstantin, that is very thorough information. I will find the time and formulate a request to Git developers. Daniel. On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 3:59:36 PM UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:06:19 -0800 (PST) > Daniel Doron

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-17 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:52:22AM -0800, Daniel Doron wrote: > see screen capture here: http://postimg.org/image/esgjyhk9j/ > had to black out some parts because of proprietary info...but I hope you > get the gist. It looks to me like you've based your work on the remote repo, i.e. your

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-17 Thread Gergely Polonkai
Hello, short answer: every commit that has a reference (tag, local or remote branch, etc.) is visible and forever (ie. won’t get garbage collected). As soon as you remove all references, the commits go invisible and the garbage collector will remove them after the set number of days (30 by

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-17 Thread Daniel Doron
Actually it did help! I forgot to delete one TAG Can you explain the rational behind this? Daniel. On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 6:28:37 PM UTC+2, Daniel Doron wrote: > > tried deleting them...changes nothing (except for the tags being gone) > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 4:13:14 PM

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Daniel Doron
tried deleting them...changes nothing (except for the tags being gone) On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 4:13:14 PM UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:52:22 -0800 (PST) > Daniel Doron wrote: > > > see screen capture here:

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:28:37 -0800 (PST) Daniel Doron wrote: > > > see screen capture here: http://postimg.org/image/esgjyhk9j/ > > > had to black out some parts because of proprietary info...but I > > > hope you get the gist. > > > > This "remote" stuff seems to be

[git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Daniel Doron
I have a local repository to which I added a remote so I can cherry pick some commits. now, I removed the remote and any related branches, as I no longer need it. my problem is that "git log --all" still shows me commits of that remote. I tried to "git gc", it did not help...any idea why it is

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Gergely Polonkai
What kind of commits do you see? Can you show us part of the git log output? 2015-11-16 14:17 GMT+01:00 Daniel Doron : > I have a local repository to which I added a remote so I can cherry pick > some commits. > now, I removed the remote and any related branches, as I

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Daniel Doron
see screen capture here: http://postimg.org/image/esgjyhk9j/ had to black out some parts because of proprietary info...but I hope you get the gist. On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 3:22:22 PM UTC+2, Gergely Polonkai wrote: > > What kind of commits do you see? Can you show us part of the git log

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:52:22 -0800 (PST) Daniel Doron wrote: > see screen capture here: http://postimg.org/image/esgjyhk9j/ > had to black out some parts because of proprietary info...but I hope > you get the gist. This "remote" stuff seems to be reachable from two

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:17:11 -0800 (PST) Daniel Doron wrote: > I have a local repository to which I added a remote so I can cherry > pick some commits. > now, I removed the remote and any related branches, as I no longer > need it. my problem is that "git log --all"

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Daniel Doron
yep. tried that On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 3:35:14 PM UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:17:11 -0800 (PST) > Daniel Doron wrote: > > > I have a local repository to which I added a remote so I can cherry > > pick some commits. > >

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Gergely Polonkai
Also I'm afraid you obfuscated too many information. Try appending --format="%h " to your log commands so you don't expose your possibly sensitive commit messages. On 16 Nov 2015 17:42, "Konstantin Khomoutov" wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:28:37 -0800 (PST) >

Re: [git-users] contaminated git log

2015-11-16 Thread Daniel Doron
Hi, sorry my bad, I forgot to provide the lol and lola aliases. lol = log --graph --decorate --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit lola = log --graph --decorate --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit --all --date=local $ git cat-file commit f0afd6e returns: - tree