While I'm sure it's not advisable for a number of reasons, is it 
technically possible?

I'm referencing:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/2862606/262852


this would have the effect of deleting, if thats the term, all commits to 
the master branch, as the master has been deleted.  Is that so?

Would you be able to then create a new branch named "master"?


thanks,

Thufir

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/git-users/-/QMQTAn-QUlUJ.
To post to this group, send email to git-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to