That makes a lot sense. It would be nice, IMHO, if everything listed in
ls-tree were able to be cat-file'd, but I understand why it's not. Thanks
so much for the direction!
On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 4:20:56 PM UTC-4, Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> I've just had a quick skim of the question.
>
> T
I've just had a quick skim of the question.
The reply that the submodule is recoreded as if it is a commit within a tree is
correct. The mode (IIRC) should be 16000 as well (can be googled for.
What is wrong is the assumption that you can dig beyond that point. The
returned sha1 is for a commit