Re: [git-users] rationale for commit a single file

2013-12-24 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:53:57 -0800 (PST) THUFIR HAWAT hawat.thu...@gmail.com wrote: your point that ...only the *published* (or sent in the form of a patch series) history is sacred but your *local* history is not... is very interesting, and while I appreciate the point, and like the sound

Re: [git-users] rationale for commit a single file

2013-12-19 Thread THUFIR HAWAT
your point that ...only the *published* (or sent in the form of a patch series) history is sacred but your *local* history is not... is very interesting, and while I appreciate the point, and like the sound of it, I'm not sure how to apply it. For me, I try out this, I try out that, maybe it

Re: [git-users] rationale for commit a single file

2013-12-18 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:18:10 -0800 (PST) THUFIR HAWAT hawat.thu...@gmail.com wrote: It seems potentially problematic to commit a single source code file, and not all source code. Potentially, for example in Java, the project might not even compile. What circumstance(s) would a single