On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 05:29:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'll look into making diff-cache be more efficient. I normally don't use
it myself, so I didn't bother (I use git-diff-files, which is way more
efficient, but doesn't show the
Hmm..
This patch actually brings up two different issues
- I actually prefer code and documentation to be separated. Finding the
actual changes to code in this patch is made much harder by the fact
that most of the changes are documentation updates. In many ways it
would have been
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- I actually prefer code and documentation to be separated. ...
first the actual change, then the docs updates.
Understood.
- I'd much rather have a generic address rewriting layer than a -b
flag.
I don't mind the shorthand at all, but
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Since it can be run as a sequestered user, and we now have plenty of CPU
horsepower on the download servers, it seems like it should be an
entirely sane thing to do.
Goodie.
Is this thing meant to be run from inetd, or is it a listen and fork
The cvsimport example in the cvs migration document was still
using the old syntax for target repository after new and
improved cvsimport-script was merged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/cvs-migration.txt |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
Clarify that the hierarchy implied by the recommended workflow
is only informal.
Refer readers to nice illustration by Rundy Dunlap.
Separate out the step to push to own public repository in the
workflow.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/tutorial.txt | 65
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:56:12 -0700 Junio C Hamano wrote:
Clarify that the hierarchy implied by the recommended workflow
is only informal.
Refer readers to nice illustration by Rundy Dunlap.
Randy(please)
Separate out the step to push to
7 matches
Mail list logo
