Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4 [u]

2005-08-12 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus [c]
On Thursday 11 August 2005 23:53, Linus Torvalds wrote: Hands up people. Does anybody _use_ GNU interactive tools? None of this I have a package crap. http://popcon.debian.org/by_inst #Format # #name is the package name; #inst is the number of people who installed this package; #vote is the

Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4

2005-08-12 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Alan Chandler wrote: Not sure I understand the proper use of dpkg-divert in Debian, but could _this_ git-core package perhaps ask the user which set of the two packages he wish to keep as git command and use dpkg-divert to change the other to another name to some other name? IIRC,

Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4

2005-08-12 Thread David Lang
after so many years of software development (and with the policy of never having conflicting command names) what three letter combinations are still avilable? I'm assuming that the much smaller pool of two letter commands was long since exhausted, but if not what two letter commands are

[PATCH] Clean generated files a bit more.

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Also attempt to build a source package for debian. --- Makefile |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) b263f24ce4f12dd39cfcd922c56a32292c6232c9 diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -238,14 +238,14 @@ rpm: dist deb: dist rm -rf

[PATCH] fetch-pack: start multi-head pulling.

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
This is a beginning of resurrecting the multi-head pulling support for git-fetch-pack command. The git-fetch-script wrapper still only knows about fetching a single head, without renaming, so it is not very useful unless you directly call git-fetch-pack itself yet. It also fixes a longstanding

[Announce] GIT v0.99.4

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
In http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/, I have placed the following binary packages: git-core-0.99.4.tar.gz git-core-0.99.4-1.i386.rpm git-core-0.99.4-1.src.rpm git-core-debuginfo-0.99.4-1.i386.rpm debian/git-core_0.99.4-2.dsc debian/git-core_0.99.4-2.tar.gz

Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4

2005-08-12 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, David Lang: after so many years of software development (and with the policy of never having conflicting command names) what three letter combinations are still avilable? Lots. I'm assuming that the much smaller pool of two letter commands was long since exhausted, but if not what

git reveals a bug in (some versions) BSD diff

2005-08-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, big was my surprise when my daily routine of git pull make test failed. git bisect revealed that commit 8e832e: String comparison of test is done with '=', not '=='. was the culprit. But it isn't. The version of diff present on my iBook (OS 10.2.8) does not work properly in this case:

[PATCH] Add --sign option to git-format-patch-script

2005-08-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
This adds the option --sign to git-format-patch-script which adds a Signed-off-by: line automatically. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- git-format-patch-script | 12 +++- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH] Clean generated files a bit more.

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This makes me a bit nervous - why are you making the rules more general? make clean removing random tarballs of mine happenning to dwell in that directory is fearsome. That is a valid concern. I'd drop that *.tar.gz part at least and probably the *.deb

Re: [PATCH] Use -script postfix for scripts

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For consistency reasons, the names of all scripts should end in -script. This may be a bit controversial (people might find it unnecessary). Subject to discussion. I have never liked the original -script name convention. It only meant that they

Re: [PATCH] Re: git-http-pull broken in latest git

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: Daniel Barkalow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, but cg-clone doesn't - it naively depended on the core git tools actually, er.. working. ;-) Sorry about that. I used to have a wrapper to deal with packs

Re: [PATCH] Add --sign option to git-format-patch-script

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Good intentions, but I'd rather see these S-O-B lines in the actual commit objects. Giving format-patch this option would discourage people to do so. Maybe a patch to git commit would be more appropriate, methinks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a

Re: [PATCH] Use -script postfix for scripts

2005-08-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
hI, On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For consistency reasons, the names of all scripts should end in -script. This may be a bit controversial (people might find it unnecessary). Subject to discussion. I have never liked the

Re: [PATCH] Add --sign option to git-format-patch-script

2005-08-12 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: Good intentions, but I'd rather see these S-O-B lines in the actual commit objects. Giving format-patch this option would discourage people to do so. Maybe a patch to git commit would be more appropriate, methinks. Maybe in addition to this

Re: git reveals a bug in (some versions) BSD diff

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd prefer to deprecate that diff program by telling so in the test. Something along the lines blabla. If this fails, chances are you have a borked diff. Try GNU diff... Wouldn't it give the people with broken diff a false impression that their

Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: start multi-head pulling.

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I seem to remember Junio does not like bash arrays... And in a recent commit message, he even admits to using something different than bash! Correct and somewhat misleading. My usual shell is bash but from time to time I try to run things with

Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Split gitk off to its own package; it needs tk installed, but nothing else does. I just noticed from dpkg --info output that the generated git-tk has Architecture: i386. Shouldn't it read all and resulting package also named

Re: git checkout -f branch doesn't remove extra files

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Luck, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I see that when I switch view to a different branch with: $ git checkout -f someoldbranch that any files that exist in my previous branch view but not in someoldbranch are not deleted. ... I wondered whether this was a deliberate choice Not

Re: gitweb - feature request

2005-08-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:53:40AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 21:58 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: I was hoping people that want stuff like this would use a RSS reader. :) I used to subscribe to the kernel RSS feed (using blam) but I found I was only getting the most

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git / cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend a new Feature Request (item #1252867); the message I received sounded as if I was the first person on the planet

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Wolfgang Denk wrote: This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know any better place to ask: Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git / cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend a new Feature

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Kirby C. Bohling
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:46:34PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Wolfgang Denk wrote: This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know any better place to ask: Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git / cogito / ...

Re: gitweb - feature request

2005-08-12 Thread Mitchell Blank Jr
Kay Sievers wrote: It's 30 now and up to 150 if they are not older than 48 hours. We can change the numbers, if you hava a better idea... Is it really hard to just make it purely time-based (git-rev-list --max-age)? Think of if Linus is merging with a lot of people and then pushes the results

[PATCH] Fix documentation installation

2005-08-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Documentation's install target now depends on man since it installs manpages. It now also installs the .txt files, to $prefix/share/doc/cogito/txt/ by default. A separate install-html target was added for installing .html files to $prefix/share/doc/cogito/html/. It isn't part of the install target

Re: [PATCH] Fix documentation installation

2005-08-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:11:45PM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... diff --git a/tools/Makefile b/tools/Makefile --- a/tools/Makefile +++ b/tools/Makefile @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ git-%: %.c all: $(PROGRAMS) install: $(PROGRAMS) $(SCRIPTS) -

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Marco Costalba
Wolfgang Denk wrote: This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know any better place to ask: Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git / cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend a new Feature Request (item #1252867);

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: The git architecture makes the central server less important, and it's easy to run your own. Also, kernel.org is providing space to a set of Yes, cou can - but for a popular project like U-Boot in our case you don't really want to ;-) people with

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote: The git architecture makes the central server less important, and it's easy to run your own. On the other hand: - the git architecture is admirably suited to an _untrusted_ central server, ie exactly the SourceForge kind of setup. I realize

Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4

2005-08-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
I just noticed from dpkg --info output that the generated git-tk has Architecture: i386. Shouldn't it read all and resulting package also named git-tk_${VERSION}_all.deb, instead of whatever architecture I happened to build it? It is correct to have Architecture: i386, as you'd naturally

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
I don't think he wants sourceforge to host git, I think he'd like sourceforge to provide access to source trees via git, instead of cvs. Read that as, I want to do: Correct, that's what I am looking for. My hope is that if enough people ask SF might actually provide such a service.

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Daniel Barkalow
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: And it's possible that git usage won't expand all that much either. But quite frankly, I think git is a lot better than CVS (or even SVN) by now, and I wouldn't be surprised if it started getting some use outside of the git-only and kernel projects

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Martin Langhoff
- the git architecture is admirably suited to an _untrusted_ central server, ie exactly the SourceForge kind of setup. I realize that the Definitely. And beyond that too. Using SF for CVS means that when SF's CVS service is down (often enough) you can't commit (or even fscking diff) until

Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

2005-08-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote: Yes, developers can just merge with each other directly I take it that you mean an exchange of patches that does not depend on having public repos. What are the mechanisms available on that front, other than patchbombs? Just have a shared

[PATCH] more Debian packaging fixes

2005-08-12 Thread Matthias Urlichs
git-tk should be architecture independent. git-core forgot to depend on perl. Signed-Off-By: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Hi, Junio C Hamano: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Split gitk off to its own package; it needs tk installed, but nothing else does. I just

Cloning speed comparison

2005-08-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Hello, I've wondered how slow the protocols other than rsync are, and the (well, a bit dubious; especially wrt. caching on the remote side) results are: git clone-pack:ssh 25s git rsync 27s git http-pull 47s git dumb-http

Re: Cloning speed comparison

2005-08-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: Anyway, clone-pack is a clear winner for networks (but someone should re-check that, especially compared to rsync, wrt. server-side file caching); really cool fast, but not very practical for anonymous access. git-daemon is for the anonymous access

Re: Cloning speed comparison

2005-08-12 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 04:12:26AM CEST, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me that... On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: Anyway, clone-pack is a clear winner for networks (but someone should re-check that, especially compared to rsync, wrt.

Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)?

2005-08-12 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 08:10:51AM +, Petr Baudis wrote: Exactly. I want much more freedom in pushing, the only requirement being that the to-be-replaced remote head is ancestor of the to-be-pushed local head. I think (am I wrong?) git-send-pack localhead:remotehead would work just fine

Re: Cloning speed comparison

2005-08-12 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Petr Baudis wrote: In my tests, the git daemon was noticeably faster than ssh, if only because the authentication actually tends to be a big part of the overhead in small pulls. Oh. Sounds nice, are there plans to run this on kernel.org too? (So far, 90% of my GIT network activity happens

Re: Cloning speed comparison

2005-08-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Running it over ssh would be a good way to do authentication... Well, if you have ssh as an option, you don't need git-daemon any more, since the protocol that git-daemon does runs quite well over ssh on its own... The only point of git-daemon

Re: Fwd: Re: git checkout -f branch doesn't remove extra files

2005-08-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:05:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: HOWEVER, if all you want to do is just a tar-file, then there's a better solution. It's called snap=git-snapshot-$(date +%Y%m%d) git-tar-tree HEAD $snap | gzip -9 $snap.tar.gz which is even easier, and a

Re: Fwd: Re: git checkout -f branch doesn't remove extra files

2005-08-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: Git actually has a _lot_ of nifty tools. I didn't realize that people didn't know about such basic stuff as git-tar-tree and git-ls-files. Btw, I just checked that git-tar-tree is documented and has a man-page. It does. However, that man-page

Re: Fwd: Re: git checkout -f branch doesn't remove extra files

2005-08-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Dave Jones wrote: Git actually has a _lot_ of nifty tools. I didn't realize that people didn't know about such basic stuff as git-tar-tree and git-ls-files. Maybe its because things are moving so fast :) Or maybe I just wasn't paying attention on that day. (I

[NETPOLL]: deadlock bugfix

2005-08-12 Thread Linux Kernel Mailing List
tree 644495567b6a66d29116e0831a96198d82d788e9 parent 11513128bb66b0b09d5d0df069b58afdb01752a2 author Jeff Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:23:50 -0700 committer David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:23:50 -0700 [NETPOLL]: deadlock bugfix This fixes an obvious deadlock

[NETPOLL]: netpoll_send_skb simplify

2005-08-12 Thread Linux Kernel Mailing List
tree 84c07d42090b81705d23103bda29b0c186fffa49 parent 6b0b31572985c2e64f7216c798766302fb782281 author Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:25:11 -0700 committer David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:25:11 -0700 [NETPOLL]: netpoll_send_skb simplify Minor

[PATCH] w1: more debug level decrease.

2005-08-12 Thread Linux Kernel Mailing List
tree 875b37dea35256467ff21fbd1bd6ebd9e4c72ebf parent 63788ea9245688772d13b979bea05bd72b239aad author Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 13 Aug 2005 01:46:22 -0700 committer Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:55:02 -0700 [PATCH] w1: more debug level decrease. Do not spam