Jeff King wrote:
but also possibly just move it with the other remote parsing, like:
[...]
Done. Thanks for the dose of sanity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Signed-off-by: Mihai Capotă mi...@mihaic.ro
---
Documentation/git-pull.txt |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-pull.txt b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
index c975743..eec4c1d 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-pull.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
Junio C Hamano wrote:
So you have to stash it somewhere. We could have made it to move
them to $HOME/.safeplace or somewhere totally unrelated to the
superproject. So in that sense, the repositories are *not* owned by
the superproject in any way. However, you are working within the
context
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
specifies a path to use instead of the default `.git`
for the base of the repository.
The '--git-dir' command-line option also sets this value.
+ If neither GIT_WORK_TREE nor '--work-tree' is set, the
+
Hello,
running gitk from Debian (1:1.8.2~rc3-1) I noticed that
$ gitk ...
$ git notes edit $some_ref_shown_by_gitk
and then pressing F5 or Shift-F5 doesn't update the notes shown.
Best regards
Uwe
PS: Please Cc: on replies as I'm not subscribed
--
Pengutronix e.K.
Hello,
(running gitk from Debian's gitk 1:1.8.2~rc3-1 package)
if only a few commits are shown in gitk such that the history canvas is
too big, i.e. there is place for more commits to be shown, the scroll
bar on the right hand side correctly is greyed out. Still I can scroll
using the mouse
Colors that are changeable in Preferences gave no sufficient control,
putting colors in the config file allows for easier configuration and
sharing of color schemes.
win32: Make the default foreground color that of window text rather
than button text.
Signed-off-by: Gauthier Östervall
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 at 18:07 EDT,
J.V. jvsr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a branch for which I have made 0 (nada) changes. I did the
following:
$git pull --rebase --no-stat -v --progress origin mybranch
I get the following
U java/Profile.java
Pull is not possible
The text is copied from Documentation/git-tag.txt.
Signed-off-by: Christian Helmuth christian.helm...@genode-labs.com
---
Documentation/git-commit.txt | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-commit.txt b/Documentation/git-commit.txt
index 24a99cc..05f8297 100644
John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net writes:
Sorry about the repeat Junio, I meant to hit Reply to All.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
[snip]
Your patch makes me wonder if
test -n $TERM_PROGRAM
without any SECURITYSESSIONID or explicit
From: Jacob Sarvisjsar...@openspan.com
log: Read gpg settings for signed commit verification
Commit signature verification fails when alternative gpg.program
signs the commit, but gpg attempts to verify the signature.
show --show-signature and log --show-signature do not read
the gpg.program
I am experiencing a segmentation fault in various versions of Git using
different repositories. Specifically, I have reproduced it using a
public repo and the latest stable Git version. Other repos trigger the
error on different versions.
Full info can be found below. Thanks,
Charlie
Test
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
which also includes all document bugs reported so far.
s/all/fixes for all/
Slurped from your github repository and didn't find anything
questionable relative to the original series
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Sitaram Chamarty sitar...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
To be paranoid, you may want to set transfer.fsckObjects to true,
perhaps in your ~/.gitconfig.
do
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
I am experiencing a segmentation fault in various versions of Git using
different repositories. Specifically, I have reproduced it using a
public repo and the latest stable Git version. Other repos trigger the
error on different versions.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:53:27PM +0100, thomas wrote:
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
I am experiencing a segmentation fault in various versions of Git using
different repositories. Specifically, I have reproduced it using a
public repo and the latest stable Git
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
So you have to stash it somewhere. We could have made it to move
them to $HOME/.safeplace or somewhere totally unrelated to the
superproject. So in that sense, the repositories are *not* owned by
the superproject in any
Mihai Capotă mi...@mihaic.ro writes:
Signed-off-by: Mihai Capotă mi...@mihaic.ro
---
Thanks.
It might be better to make it which resulted in complex conflicts,
though.
Documentation/git-pull.txt |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Hans Brigman hbrig...@openspan.com writes:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=_002_8C726954D36902459248B0627BF2E66F45D70C3E4EAUSP01VMBX10c_
No multipart/anything please. We prefer to see text/plain.
In general, please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
From: Jacob
Hans Brigman hbrig...@openspan.com writes:
From: Jacob Sarvis jsar...@openspan.com
config: Consistent call style to gpg settings
Calling style for passing settings to git_gpg_config is inconsistent
between commit-tree, commit, merge, tag, and verify-tag.
Consolidate style of calling
Hi,
Le 27.03.2013 16:05, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
Yann Droneaud ydrone...@opteya.com writes:
Tested against master, 7b592fadf1e23b10b913e0771b9f711770597266
Is this because I suggested you to clean things up while you were
touching in a vicinity of something that could use this clean-up?
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
}
-
+ if (git_gpg_config(var, value, cb) 0)
+ return -1;
if (grep_config(var, value, cb) 0)
return -1;
Hmph. I do not particularly like the way the call to grep_config()
loses
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com wrote:
This originates from an msysgit pull request, see:
https://github.com/msysgit/git/pull/58
Signed-off-by: Eric Wieser wieser.e...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sschube...@gmail.com
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
Looks like a simple typo in merge-tree.c::unresolved:
Thanks.
-- 8 --
merge-tree: fix typo in merge-tree.c::unresolved
When calculating whether there is a d/f conflict, the calculation of
whether both sides are directories generates an incorrect
git status takes 30 seconds on Windows 7. Here are some stats:
git ls-files | wc -l
27330
git ls-files -o | wc -l
4
$ git diff --name-only | xargs du -chs
68K update_import_contacts.php
68K total
What can I do??? This is so slow it is unbearable.
By the way i've done git gc several
On 03/27/2013 05:39 PM, Jim Kinsman wrote:
git status takes 30 seconds on Windows 7. Here are some stats:
git ls-files | wc -l
27330
git ls-files -o | wc -l
4
$ git diff --name-only | xargs du -chs
68K update_import_contacts.php
68K total
What can I do??? This is so slow it
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:39:31 -0500
Jim Kinsman jakins...@gmail.com wrote:
git status takes 30 seconds on Windows 7. Here are some stats:
[...]
What can I do??? This is so slow it is unbearable.
By the way i've done git gc several times and nothing changed.
You could try some voodoo [1] or
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
So you have to stash it somewhere. We could have made it to move
them to $HOME/.safeplace or somewhere totally unrelated to the
superproject. So in that sense, the repositories are *not* owned by
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
}
-
+ if (git_gpg_config(var, value, cb) 0)
+ return -1;
if (grep_config(var, value, cb) 0)
return -1;
Hmph. I do not particularly like the way the call
Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] wrote:
Edward Thomson ethom...@microsoft.com writes:
I would propose that this not simply track rename conflicts, but all
conflicts.
That is a no starter.
So. Can you explain to me why this would be a non starter? Can you suggest
some alternate
Signed-off-by: Mihai Capotă mi...@mihaic.ro
---
Documentation/git-pull.txt |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-pull.txt b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
index c975743..24ab07a 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-pull.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
I am experiencing a segmentation fault in various versions of Git using
different repositories.
...
Test Command
git merge-tree 26bb22a052fef9f74063afd4fc6fc11fe200b19f
8d6bdf012941d876b2279994e02f1bb0d5c26e7d
Junio,
I don't see this queued in 'pu'. Do you have any objections to the
patch, or did you just forget?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, I'm deviating. I learnt why you think the hack is necessary
and not too wrong.
OK.
As I explained above, the entire design is
asymmetric and inelegant; I think we can do much better than this.
I personally find the explained above
From: Jacob Sarvis jsar...@openspan.com
Calling style for passing settings to git_gpg_config is inconsistent
between commit-tree, commit, log, merge, tag, and verify-tag.
Consolidate style of calling git_gpg_config.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Sarvis jsar...@openspan.com
Signed-off-by: Hans Brigman
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:35:58 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Rob Hoelz r...@hoelz.ro writes:
On 3/19/13 7:08 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Test nits:
...
Hope
git push currently doesn't consider pushInsteadOf when
using pushurl; this test tests that.
If you use pushurl with an alias that has a pushInsteadOf configuration
value, Git does not take advantage of it. For example:
[url git://github.com/]
insteadOf = github:
[url
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:39:31AM -0500, Jim Kinsman wrote:
git status takes 30 seconds on Windows 7. Here are some stats:
git ls-files | wc -l
27330
git ls-files -o | wc -l
4
$ git diff --name-only | xargs du -chs
68K update_import_contacts.php
68K total
What can I do???
Edward Thomson ethom...@microsoft.com writes:
Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] wrote:
Edward Thomson ethom...@microsoft.com writes:
I would propose that this not simply track rename conflicts, but all
conflicts.
That is a no starter.
So. Can you explain to me why this would
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
I don't see this queued in 'pu'. Do you have any objections to the
patch, or did you just forget?
I do not recall the details but I think I was expecting a re-roll
updating the log message (if the original invited questions, there
must have been
On 27/03/13 17:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
I am experiencing a segmentation fault in various versions of Git using
different repositories.
...
Test Command
git merge-tree 26bb22a052fef9f74063afd4fc6fc11fe200b19f
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
I am also using this to obtain a diff that would be applied if a merge
were to be run. Is there a better way to obtain this information that is
more commonly used?
You can do an actual merge using detached HEAD:
$ git checkout --detach
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net writes:
git-svn: Support custom tunnel schemes instead of SSH only (2013-03-27
04:28:04 +)
Thanks. Will pull.
By the way, did nobody in the patch chain find the log message
problematic? It does not give
The only anti-virus I have installed is Microsoft Security Essentials
I turned off and it was still the same:
$ cat /usr/bin/gitstatus
start_time=`date +%s`
git status echo run time is $(expr `date +%s` - $start_time) s
$ gitstatus
# On branch test
# Changes not staged for commit:
# (use git
Jonathan Nieder-2 wrote
Is the [transfer] fsckObjects configuration on the host executing the
clone set to true?
I hadn't been setting it at all, and according to git-config(1) it defaults
to false, so the answer is no. It looks like setting it might be a good
idea.
But I'm still somewhat
Rob Hoelz wrote:
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -465,7 +465,11 @@ static void alias_all_urls(void)
if (!remotes[i])
continue;
for (j = 0; j remotes[i]-pushurl_nr; j++) {
- remotes[i]-pushurl[j] =
Junio C Hamano wrote
If you use --local, that is equivalent to cp -R. Your corruption
in the source will faithfully be byte-for-byte copied to the
destination. If you do not
...
transport layer will notice
object corruption.
...
The difference between --mirror and no --mirror is a red
Jeff King wrote:
There was a big thread about a month ago on whether Git should do Google
Summer of Code this year[1].
[...]
In my opinion, a lot of the issues come down to project selection;
Let me throw in some other issues. :)
* I think the git project has been very disorganized in
Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] wrote:
We do not gratuitously break existing implementations. If no conflict is
stored
as higher-stage index entries in an index that has your index extension, no
existing implementation can read a conflicted index written by your
implementation and
I have a local/development branch tracked to origin/development. I made
no changes to local/dev and did a git pull with rebase, I did not expect
any conflicts.
I got a conflict and was thrown onto another branch. I attempted a
merge (using IntelliJ) accepting everything from the server but
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:46:57PM +, John Keeping wrote:
I think the simple reality is that Git was written with the assumption
that stat is cheap and that isn't really the case on Windows, where the
filesystem cache doesn't seem to do that well with this.
Yes, I think that's pretty much
Rich Fromm richard_fr...@yahoo.com writes:
Apologies if my questions are considered slightly off topic -- I'm not
positive if this is supposed to be a list for developers, and not users.
The list is both for users and developers.
However, I think there may be room for some additional clarity
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
Yes, I would need to be able to do this on a bare repo for my use case.
And if it's on the server, you don't want this to be observable, so
you don't want HEAD to move around. I don't know a better way than:
$ git clone --shared -b
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Even then, working with one worktree embedded
inside another is something git never designed for: it explains why I
have to literally fight with git when using submodules
Do you mean that you wish you could ignore subrepository boundaries
and
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Yes, I think that's pretty much the case (though most of my
Git-on-Windows experience is from cygwin long ago, where the stat
performance was truly horrendous). Have you tried setting
core.preloadindex, which should run the
Edward Thomson ethom...@microsoft.com writes:
Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] wrote:
We do not gratuitously break existing implementations. If no conflict is
stored
as higher-stage index entries in an index that has your index extension, no
existing implementation can read a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:16:24PM -0500, Jed Brown wrote:
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
Yes, I would need to be able to do this on a bare repo for my use case.
And if it's on the server, you don't want this to be observable, so
you don't want HEAD to move around. I
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:23:15AM -0700, Rich Fromm wrote:
But I'm still somewhat confused about what is and is not checked under what
conditions. Consider the three statements:
# 1
git clone --mirror myuser@myhost:my_repo
# 2
git clone --mirror --config transfer.fsckObjects=true
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org writes:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Yes, I think that's pretty much the case (though most of my
Git-on-Windows experience is from cygwin long ago, where the stat
performance was truly horrendous). Have you
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:45:21PM +, John Keeping wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:16:24PM -0500, Jed Brown wrote:
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
Yes, I would need to be able to do this on a bare repo for my use case.
And if it's on the server, you don't
From: Thomas Rast tr...@inf.ethz.ch
Almost the same as last time. Changed: the rename suggested by Junio
The only little concern I may have is this cmp_* function tells us
I found it! by returning true, which is counter-intuitive to the
readers of the caller (not the callee).
I think it
packed_object_info() and packed_delta_info() were mutually recursive.
The former would handle ordinary types and defer deltas to the latter;
the latter would use the former to resolve the delta base.
This arrangement, however, leads to trouble with threaded index-pack
and long delta chains on
Similar to the recursion in packed_object_info(), this leads to
problems on stack-space-constrained systems in the presence of long
delta chains.
We proceed in three phases:
1. Dig through the delta chain, saving each delta object's offsets and
size on an ad-hoc stack.
2. Unpack the base
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Given that we haven't tweaked the parallelism or thread-cost
parameters since the inception of the mechanism in Nov 2008, I
suspect that we would see praises from some and grievances from
other corners of the user base
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Even then, working with one worktree embedded
inside another is something git never designed for: it explains why I
have to literally fight with git when using submodules
Do you mean that you wish
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:21:34PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
+# Convert byte at offset $2 of object $1 into '\0'
+corrupt_byte() {
+ obj_file=$(obj_to_file $1)
+ chmod +w $obj_file
+ printf '\0' | dd of=$obj_file bs=1 seek=$2
+}
Hmm, this last line should probably be:
diff
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I was kind of surprised to see this still in pu, too. I thought it was
supposed to cook in next for a while to shake out any interoperability
bugs (and it was in next previously). Did it get ejected after the
release and then never put back?
Yes, I've been
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:40:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
[Cooking]
[...]
* jk/index-pack-correct-depth-fix (2013-03-20) 1 commit
- index-pack: always zero-initialize object_entry list
index-pack --fix-thin used uninitialize value to compute delta
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:50:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
I was kind of surprised to see this still in pu, too. I thought it was
supposed to cook in next for a while to shake out any interoperability
bugs (and it was in next previously). Did it get
On 27/03/13 20:01, Jeff King wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:45:21PM +, John Keeping wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:16:24PM -0500, Jed Brown wrote:
Charlie Smurthwaite char...@atechmedia.com writes:
Yes, I would need to be able to do this on a bare repo for my use case.
And if
I have two local branches (tracked to remote) that are in sync (did a
git pull on both branches from their corresponding remote).
Is this the best way to merge?
I would be merging local/branch1 = local/branch2 (test this branch) and
then push local/branch2 = origin/branch1 (and would expect
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, typo. The configuration in the example above should have been
[url git://anongit.myserver.example.com/]
insteadOf = myserver.example.com:
[url myserver.example.com:]
pushInsteadOf =
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:47:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jk/difftool-dir-diff-edit-fix (2013-03-14) 3 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2013-03-19 at e68014a)
+ difftool --dir-diff: symlink all files matching the working tree
+ difftool: avoid double slashes in symlink targets
+
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff King wrote:
There was a big thread about a month ago on whether Git should do Google
Summer of Code this year[1].
I think we should do it.
It looks strange to me to say that students are great and at the same
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:47:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jk/difftool-dir-diff-edit-fix (2013-03-14) 3 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2013-03-19 at e68014a)
+ difftool --dir-diff: symlink all files matching the working tree
+ difftool:
Currently, when a dir-diff is made with git-difftool the two revisions are
stored in two temporary directories .../left and .../right.
Many difftools show these pathnames in ther UI and therefore it would be helpful
for users, if actual reference names specified as progam arguments was used
Junio C Hamano wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:40:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jn/add-2.0-u-A-sans-pathspec (2013-03-20) 5 commits
- git add: -u/-A now affects the entire working tree
- add -A: only show pathless 'add -A' warning when changes exist outside cwd
- add -u: only show
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:07:18 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, typo. The configuration in the example above should have
been
[url git://anongit.myserver.example.com/]
insteadOf = myserver.example.com:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:15:44PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:47:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jk/difftool-dir-diff-edit-fix (2013-03-14) 3 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2013-03-19 at e68014a)
+ difftool
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:47:35 -0700
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Rob Hoelz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:23:45 -0700
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppose I configure
[url git://anongit.myserver.example.com/]
insteadOf =
Rob Hoelz wrote:
My mistake; I had not seen it! I thought you may have found a bug in
my implementation, so I wanted to double check. =)
Well, I had found an unfortunate consequence of the implementation
that uses an unnecessary copy. :)
Will follow up to the updated patch.
--
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:42:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
When the same file is added with identical content at the top level,
git-merge-tree prints added in both with the details. But if the file
is added in an existing subdirectory,
Am 27.03.2013 18:02, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
So you have to stash it somewhere. We could have made it to move
them to $HOME/.safeplace or somewhere totally unrelated to the
superproject. So in
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:56:56 -0700
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob Hoelz wrote:
My mistake; I had not seen it! I thought you may have found a bug
in my implementation, so I wanted to double check. =)
Well, I had found an unfortunate consequence of the implementation
that
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13:17PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Currently, when a dir-diff is made with git-difftool the two revisions are
stored in two temporary directories .../left and .../right.
Many difftools show these pathnames in ther UI and therefore it would be
helpful
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:48:45PM -0500, Rob Hoelz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:07:18 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, typo. The configuration in the example above should have
been
[url
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:09:43PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:48:45PM -0500, Rob Hoelz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:07:18 -0700
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, typo. The configuration in the
Josh Triplett wrote:
I have a .gitconfig in my git-managed home
directory which sets pushInsteadOf so that I can clone via git:// and
immediately have working push. I work with a number of systems that
don't have inbound access to each other but do have outbound access
insn appears to be an in-code abbreviation and should not appear in
manual/help pages.
---
Documentation/config.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index c1f435f..f79184c 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
Filter the list of refs returned via the dumb HTTP protocol according
to the active namespace, consistent with other clients of the
upload-pack service.
Signed-off-by: John Koleszar jkoles...@google.com
---
http-backend.c | 8 +---
t/lib-httpd/apache.conf | 5 +
Matthias Krüger matthias.krue...@famsik.de writes:
insn appears to be an in-code abbreviation and should not appear in
manual/help pages.
---
Thanks; sign-off?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
93 matches
Mail list logo
