The option is spelled '--deleted'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de
---
t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
index 8f3b54d8..88d60c1c 100755
---
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 06:44:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us writes:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:46:23AM -0400, W. Trevor King wrote:
David and Junio mentioned that I'd missed a few 2.6 references in my
initial pass. Here's a second attempt that does
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:33:21PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
+ __git_complete_index_file --with-tree=HEAD --cached --deleted
Might as well go all the way with --cached --deleted --unmerged
--others no? What is the point of --with-tree=HEAD?
This script lists people that might be interested in a patch by going
back through the history for each patch hunk, and finding people that
reviewed, acknowledge, signed, or authored the code the patch is
modifying.
It does this by running git-blame incrementally on each hunk and then
parsing the
Accept multiple patch files rather than only one. For example:
% git contacts feature/*.patch
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
---
contrib/contacts/git-contacts | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/contacts/git-contacts
Committishes can be mentioned along with patch files in the same
invocation. For example:
% git contacts master..feature extra/*.patch
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com
---
contrib/contacts/git-contacts | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:48:07PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com
---
contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-completion.bash
SZEDER Gábor wrote:
Either way, why these five options? 'git rev-parse' has a lot more
options than that.
We have to start somewhere, so I put in the options that I personally use.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
SZEDER Gábor wrote:
-test_expect_success 'ls-files --delete' '
+test_expect_success 'ls-files --deleted' '
setup_absent
test -z $(git ls-files -d)
While at it, change this to --deleted?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:48:06PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
+ __git_complete_index_file --with-tree=HEAD --cached --others
The code is OK, the rest of the function is pretty straightforward,
but I think this line would warrant a sentence in the log message,
considering that at
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:25:18PM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
Signed-off-by: John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk
---
contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 2 ++
t/t9902-completion.sh | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/git-check-ignore.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-check-ignore.txt
b/Documentation/git-check-ignore.txt
index 8e1f7ab..d2df487 100644
---
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:39:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Thanks. I'll queue it with a pair of fix-up commits on top, so that
they can later be squashed in.
The result of squashing the fix-ups would look like this.
Thanks! I agree with all of your changes.
-- 8 --
From:
Am 29.06.2013 11:11, schrieb Chris Packham:
On 28/06/13 22:42, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
technically it looks fine to me (except for the lack of tests) but I'm
not sure I follow the use case.
In your case, you want to run a script to determinate if that certain
submodule should use merge or
Ramsay Jones wrote:
Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 06/27/2013 12:35 AM, Jeff King wrote:
[ ... ]
I think Michael's assessment above is missing one thing.
Peff is absolutely right; for some unknown reason I was thinking of the
consistency check as having been already fixed.
Well, the cygwin:
SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de writes:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:48:07PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com
---
contrib/completion/git-completion.bash | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git
Petr Baudis pa...@ucw.cz writes:
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:39:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Thanks. I'll queue it with a pair of fix-up commits on top, so that
they can later be squashed in.
The result of squashing the fix-ups would look like this.
Thanks! I agree with all
Fredrik Gustafsson iv...@iveqy.com writes:
OK, then --depth it is.
The points in your review on the last version with --depth (which
I picked up and parked on 'pu') still need to be addressed, I think?
I agree, I'm on it
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 07:13:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net writes:
Does this correspond to the following comment in the same file, and
if so, shouldn't this part of your patch?
Yes, yes,
SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de writes:
The option is spelled '--deleted'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de
---
Thanks.
t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com
---
Thanks, good eyes.
I wonder if we can come up with an automated and reliable way to add
to check-docs target of the main Makefile to catch this kind of thing.
On 2013-06-28 04.46, Mark Levedahl wrote:
On 06/27/2013 01:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes:
Work around issues that git hangs when doing fetch or pull under
various protocols under CYGWIN.
Replace pipe() with a socket connection using a TCP/IP.
Ramsay Jones ram...@ramsay1.demon.co.uk writes:
Ramsay Jones wrote:
Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 06/27/2013 12:35 AM, Jeff King wrote:
[ ... ]
I think Michael's assessment above is missing one thing.
Peff is absolutely right; for some unknown reason I was thinking of the
consistency check
Torsten Bögershausen tbo...@web.de writes:
I testet rj/cygwin-remove-cheating-lstat with the socket pipe on top:
no hanging.
Then I run rj/cygwin-remove-cheating-lstat without socket pipe,
(or in other words git.git/pu):
No hanging.
So an immediate conclusion is that we can forget about
SZEDER Gábor sze...@fzi.de writes:
Without the '-c' part it's obviously correct and together with patch
1/2 is
Acked-by: SZEDER Gábor sze...@ira.uka.de
Thanks, both. Will queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to
25 matches
Mail list logo
