On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
* rh/remote-hg-bzr-updates (2013-11-18) 9 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2013-11-20 at a36f3c4)
+ remote-bzr, remote-hg: fix email address regular expression
+ test-hg.sh: help user correlate verbose output with email
remote-hg is using a mercurial shared clone to store all remotes objects
in one place. Unfortunately, the sharedpath is stored as an absolute
path by mercurial, creating a dependency on the location of the git
repository. Whenever the git repository is moved, the sharedpath must
be updated to
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com wrote:
remote-hg is using a mercurial shared clone to store all remotes objects
in one place. Unfortunately, the sharedpath is stored as an absolute
path by mercurial, creating a dependency on the location of the git
If bash.prompt is set to false, disable the prompt. This is useful
for huge repositories like the home directory.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Hokkanen h...@users.sf.net
---
git-prompt.sh performance seems to be quite bad for big repositories, so
without a way to disable it selectively for repositories,
Am 23.11.2013 14:18, schrieb Heikki Hokkanen:
If bash.prompt is set to false, disable the prompt. This is useful
for huge repositories like the home directory.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Hokkanen h...@users.sf.net
---
git-prompt.sh performance seems to be quite bad for big repositories, so
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:42 -0800, Shawn Pearce wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto c...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
given that the ship has already sailed
Up to now git has assumed that all servers are able to fix thin
packs. This is however not always the case.
Document the 'no-thin' capability and prevent send-pack from generating
a thin pack if the server advertises it.
---
This is a re-roll of the series I sent earlier this month, switching
it
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 17:07 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
Up to now git has assumed that all servers are able to fix thin
packs. This is however not always the case.
Document the 'no-thin' capability and prevent send-pack from generating
a thin pack if the server advertises it.
Sorry,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org wrote:
Gah! This adds a fork+exec each time the prompt is shown. Not good,
particularly on Windows.
Since your intent is to disable the prompt in the home directory,
wouldn't that mean that most of the time you *don't* want the
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com wrote:
remote-hg is using a mercurial shared clone to store all remotes objects
in one place. Unfortunately, the sharedpath is stored as an absolute
path by mercurial, creating a dependency on the location of the git
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Antoine Pelisse apeli...@gmail.com wrote:
remote-hg is using a mercurial shared clone to store all remotes objects
in one place. Unfortunately, the sharedpath is stored as an
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 03:18:23PM +0200, Heikki Hokkanen wrote:
If bash.prompt is set to false, disable the prompt. This is useful
for huge repositories like the home directory.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Hokkanen h...@users.sf.net
---
git-prompt.sh performance seems to be quite bad for
Hi,
Using the latest git version (1.8.5.rc3), I get this
this warning/error:
sb@sb:/tmp$ git clone https://github.com/Bertram25/ValyriaTear.git
Cloning into 'ValyriaTear'...
remote: Counting objects: 21346, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6307/6307), done.
remote: Total 21346 (delta
Am 22.11.2013 23:09, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
Heiko Voigt wrote:
After that we can discuss whether add should add submodules that are
tracked but not shown. How about commit -a ? Should it also ignore the
change? I am undecided here. There does not seem to be any good
decision. From the
From 2763be1fe68d07af60945762178b8494228eb45f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre Penninckx ibizapea...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:03:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] subtree: add squash handling for split and push
The documentation of subtree says that the --squash option can be used
for
Am 22.11.2013 22:54, schrieb Heiko Voigt:
What I think needs fixing here first is that the ignore setting should not
apply to any diffs between HEAD and index. IMO, it should only apply
to the diff between worktree and index.
Not only that. It should also apply to diffs between commits/trees
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 09:10:44PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 22.11.2013 23:09, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
Heiko Voigt wrote:
After that we can discuss whether add should add submodules that are
tracked but not shown. How about commit -a ? Should it also ignore the
change? I am
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 09:32:45PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote:
Am 22.11.2013 22:54, schrieb Heiko Voigt:
What I think needs fixing here first is that the ignore setting should not
apply to any diffs between HEAD and index. IMO, it should only apply
to the diff between worktree and index.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:07:55PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
Up to now git has assumed that all servers are able to fix thin
packs. This is however not always the case.
Document the 'no-thin' capability and prevent send-pack from generating
a thin pack if the server advertises it.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:36:36PM +0100, Stefan Beller wrote:
sb@sb:/tmp$ git clone https://github.com/Bertram25/ValyriaTear.git
Cloning into 'ValyriaTear'...
remote: Counting objects: 21346, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6307/6307), done.
remote: Total 21346 (delta 16463),
20 matches
Mail list logo
