There is consensus that the default should change because it will
benefit nearly all users (some just a little, but some a lot).
See [1] and replies.
[1]:
http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/git-status-takes-30-seconds-on-Windows-7-Why-tp7580816p7580853.html
Signed-off-by: Steve Hoelzer shoel
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
Git for Windows users may want to try core.fscache=true as well [1]. This
eliminates the UAC penalties for repositories located on the Windows system
drive [2].
[1] https://github.com/msysgit/git/pull/94
[2]
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Sup Yut Sum ch3co...@gmail.com writes:
async is in C# 5.0
foreach is in C# 1.0
instanceof is in Java. The similar keywords are typeof, is, as in C# 1.0
This one made me read it twice, until I realized you meant
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Steve Hoelzer shoel...@gmail.com writes:
instanceof() is listed as keywords, but there is no such thing (it is
in Java, though); in C# we use typeof(), 'is', and 'as for similar
purposes
You would need to balance
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> yes, it is true: since mid-August I am working for Microsoft. Over a
> year ago, I got into contact with the Visual Studio Online group at
> Microsoft, of which I am now a happy member. A large
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
>> On 05 Oct 2017, at 22:02, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Git users,
>>
>> It is my pleasure to announce that Git for Windows 2.14.2(2) is available
>> from:
>>
>>
Johannes,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Dear Git users,
>
> It is my pleasure to announce that Git for Windows 2.14.2(3) is available
> from:
>
> https://git-for-windows.github.io/
>
> Changes since Git for Windows v2.14.2(2)
Johannes,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Johannes Schindelin
<johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Steve Hoelzer wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Joh
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:22 AM Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
> Am 31.10.18 um 22:11 schrieb Steve Hoelzer via GitGitGadget:
> > From: Steve Hoelzer
> >
> > From Visual Studio 2015 Code Analysis: Warning C28159 Consider using
> > 'GetTickCount64' instead of 'GetTickCount'
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 11:43 AM Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
> Am 02.11.18 um 15:47 schrieb Steve Hoelzer:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:22 AM Johannes Sixt wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 31.10.18 um 22:11 schrieb Steve Hoelzer via GitGitGadget:
> >>> @@ -614,7 +
From: Steve Hoelzer
>From Visual Studio 2015 Code Analysis: Warning C28159 Consider using
'GetTickCount64' instead of 'GetTickCount'.
Reason: GetTickCount() overflows roughly every 49 days. Code that does
not take that into account can loop indefinitely. GetTickCount64()
operates on 64
11 matches
Mail list logo