The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.comp.version-control.git as well.
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Thomas Ackermann writes:
>>> > But for the simple use case where you only have a master
>>> > branch I consider it not really helpful and - at least for
Thomas Ackermann writes:
>
>> > But for the simple use case where you only have a master
>> > branch I consider it not really helpful and - at least for me -
>> > misleading.
>>
>> I see what you mean, and you're not the only one.
>>
>> Git follows a rule of "never contact another machine unl
> > But for the simple use case where you only have a master
> > branch I consider it not really helpful and - at least for me -
> > misleading.
>
> I see what you mean, and you're not the only one.
>
> Git follows a rule of "never contact another machine unless explicitly
> asked to using a co
Hi,
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
>>In repo_b your ref for origin/master
>> has not moved. It has remotely (meaning refs/heads/master in repo_a
>> has moved), but git status is not hitting the remote to find out; it
>> only looks at the local state.
[...]
> But for the s
>
> Unfortunately that's not true. In repo_b your ref for origin/master
> has not moved. It has remotely (meaning refs/heads/master in repo_a
> has moved), but git status is not hitting the remote to find out; it
> only looks at the local state. To see what I mean, run git fetch in
> repo_b. Onc
2014/1/6 Thomas Ackermann :
>
> Hi Jiang,
>
> this happens with all of my repo clones (I am using V1.8.5.2
> on Windows and on Linux). Steps to reproduce:
>
> mkdir repo_a && cd repo_a && git init .
> echo "1">foo && git add foo && git commit -m "1"
> cd ..
> git clone repo_a repo_b
> cd repo_a
> e
It has remotely (meaning refs/heads/master in repo_a
has moved), but git status is not hitting the remote to find out; it
only looks at the local state. To see what I mean, run git fetch in
repo_b. Once you do that, you'll see that git status correctly reports
you're behind.
>
&g
te with 'origin/master'"
which is obviously wrong.
---
Thomas
- Original Nachricht ----
Von: Jiang Xin
An: Thomas Ackermann
Datum: 06.01.2014 06:31
Betreff: Re: [Bug report] 'git status' always says "Your branch is up-to-date
with 'origin/master'
2014/1/5 Thomas Ackermann :
> Since f223459 "status: always show tracking branch even no change"
> 'git status' (and 'git checkout master' always says
> "Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'"
> even if 'origin/master' is way ahead from local 'master'.
Hi, Thomas
Can you provide your ope
Since f223459 "status: always show tracking branch even no change"
'git status' (and 'git checkout master' always says
"Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'"
even if 'origin/master' is way ahead from local 'master'.
---
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
10 matches
Mail list logo