Re: [GUILT v2 12/29] guilt header: more robust header selection.

2014-05-16 Thread Per Cederqvist
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Jeff Sipek jef...@josefsipek.net wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:48PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote: If you run something like guilt header '.*' the command would crash, because the grep comand that tries to ensure that the patch exist would detect a match,

Re: [GUILT v2 12/29] guilt header: more robust header selection.

2014-05-16 Thread Jeff Sipek
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:51:37AM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Jeff Sipek jef...@josefsipek.net wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:48PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote: If you run something like guilt header '.*' the command would crash, because the grep

Re: [GUILT v2 12/29] guilt header: more robust header selection.

2014-05-15 Thread Jeff Sipek
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:48PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote: If you run something like guilt header '.*' the command would crash, because the grep comand that tries to ensure that the patch exist would detect a match, but the later code expected the match to be exact. Fixed by comparing

[GUILT v2 12/29] guilt header: more robust header selection.

2014-05-13 Thread Per Cederqvist
If you run something like guilt header '.*' the command would crash, because the grep comand that tries to ensure that the patch exist would detect a match, but the later code expected the match to be exact. Fixed by comparing exact strings. And as a creeping feature guilt header will now try to