[PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact

2012-08-22 Thread Joachim Schmitz
Signed-off-by: Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de --- Makefile| 18 ++ compat/win32/poll.c | 8 ++-- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 6b0c961..2af4db3 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -152,6

Re: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact

2012-08-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes: Signed-off-by: Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de --- Makefile| 18 ++ compat/win32/poll.c | 8 ++-- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index

RE: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact

2012-08-22 Thread Joachim Schmitz
From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:13 PM To: Joachim Schmitz Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; Erik Faye-Lund; Johannes Sixt; Marius Storm-Olsen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact Joachim

Re: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact

2012-08-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes: Do you really need to have both? I suspect If you do not have a usable sys/poll.h, set NO_SYS_POLL_H may be a simpler alternative, but there must Hmm, Not having sys/poll.h and not having poll() are different thinks, aren't they? Ahh, OK, I

RE: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part intact

2012-08-22 Thread Joachim Schmitz
intact From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:13 PM To: Joachim Schmitz Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; Erik Faye-Lund; Johannes Sixt; Marius Storm-Olsen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support non-WIN32 system lacking poll() while keeping the WIN32 part