On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:42:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
Perhaps it's best to leave the patch as it originally was to guarantee
that we can't get stuck in graph_show_commit(), even when it's called at
an unexpected time, but I see you've
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:42:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
Perhaps it's best to leave the patch as it originally was to guarantee
that we can't get stuck in graph_show_commit(), even when it's called at
---
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 03:39:33PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jk/diff-graph-cleanup (2013-02-07) 6 commits
- combine-diff.c: teach combined diffs about line prefix
- diff.c: use diff_line_prefix() where applicable
- diff: add diff_line_prefix function
- diff.c: make constant
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:30:39AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
Can you squash this into the first commit before you do?
Matthieu is correct that the graph_is_commit_finished() check isn't
needed in the loop now that we've pulled it out to be
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:30:39AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
...
Is it correct to say that this essentially re-does 656197ad3805
(graph.c: infinite loop in git whatchanged --graph -m, 2009-07-25)
in a slightly different way, in that Michał's
5 matches
Mail list logo
