This patch adds the ability for git am to accept patches in the format
generated by git show. Some people erroneously use git show instead
of git format-patch, and it's nice as a maintainer to be able to
easily take their patch rather than going back and forth with them to
get a correctly
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Subject: [PATCH] [git-am] Handle git show output correctly
The convention in Git is subsystem: summary of change (i.e. no
brackets around git-am, just am: and no capital for Handle).
My other concerns (name of stgit, multi-lines subject lines and lack
Matthieu Moy matthieu@grenoble-inp.fr writes:
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Subject: [PATCH] [git-am] Handle git show output correctly
The convention in Git is subsystem: summary of change (i.e. no
brackets around git-am, just am: and no capital for Handle).
My other concerns
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:32 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
We do not want to apply git show output that munges the log
message, period.
If you want to give patches to somebody (or to yourself) via e-mail
or via sneaker-net, git format-patch is there for you. Do not
butcher am to accept a
This patch adds the ability for git am to accept patches in the format
generated by git show. Some people erroneously use git show instead
of git format-patch, and it's nice as a maintainer to be able to
easily take their patch rather than going back and forth with them to
get a correctly
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com writes:
Let me put it a different way - if you won't accept git-am handling git
show output because git show has output that wasn't designed to be
parsed ever, would you be opposed to a patch that switches the git
show output to be something usable?
The output
On 09/13/2012 12:19 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dan Johnson computerdr...@gmail.com writes:
Not really. If we start encouraging people to use git show output
as a kosher input to am, we would have to support such use
forever, and we end up painting ourselves in a corner we cannot get
out of
Dan Johnson computerdr...@gmail.com writes:
I was assuming Peter would accept the patch, and reply with a in the
future, please submit the output of format-patch, thus correcting the
submitter's behavior. This warning would serve someone who did not
know that they wanted the output of
8 matches
Mail list logo
