On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Here is what I tentatively queued.
>
> rebase-am: explicitly disable cover-letter
>
> If the user has a cover-letter configuration set to anything
> other than 'false', 'git format-patch' may generate a cover
> letter, which
Felipe Contreras writes:
>> You are mean to say "fix regression", which gave me a small heart
>> attack ;-). I was worried if we had already merged it to 'next'.
>>
>> As I already wrote in the recent "What's cooking", the series looks
>> good to me. I am inclined to say that we should merge it
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> If you have a cover-letter configuration set to anything other than
>> 'false', 'git format-patch' might generate a cover letter, and 'git am'
>> doesn't seem to like that.
>>
>> Ideally 'git am' should skip th
Felipe Contreras writes:
> If you have a cover-letter configuration set to anything other than
> 'false', 'git format-patch' might generate a cover letter, and 'git am'
> doesn't seem to like that.
>
> Ideally 'git am' should skip the cover-letter, but for now lets just fix
> the regression.
>
>
If you have a cover-letter configuration set to anything other than
'false', 'git format-patch' might generate a cover letter, and 'git am'
doesn't seem to like that.
Ideally 'git am' should skip the cover-letter, but for now lets just fix
the regression.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
git
5 matches
Mail list logo
