2014-03-01 2:27 GMT+08:00 Faiz Kothari :
> Hi,
> Thanks for the suggestions and remarks.
> I rewrote bulk-checkin.c:finish_bulk_checkin() using strbuf. But saw
> that Sun He has already implemented the same way I have done.
> Should I submit my implementation as a patch?
>
> Secondly,
> I tried imp
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Faiz Kothari wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions and remarks.
[Administrivia: On this list, top-posting is frowned upon; inline
responses are preferred.]
> I rewrote bulk-checkin.c:finish_bulk_checkin() using strbuf. But saw
> that Sun He has already implemented
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions and remarks.
I rewrote bulk-checkin.c:finish_bulk_checkin() using strbuf. But saw
that Sun He has already implemented the same way I have done.
Should I submit my implementation as a patch?
Secondly,
I tried implementing this WITHOUT changing the prototype of the
fun
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Faiz Kothari wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Kothari
>
> Notes:
> I finally got what's happening, and why the errors were caused.
> packname is supposed to contain the complete path to the .pack file.
> Packs are stored as /path/to/.pack which I overlooke
Signed-off-by: Faiz Kothari
Notes:
I finally got what's happening, and why the errors were caused.
packname is supposed to contain the complete path to the .pack file.
Packs are stored as /path/to/.pack which I overlooked earlier.
After inspecting what is happening in pack-write.c
5 matches
Mail list logo