Re: [PATCH] send-pack.c: mark a file-local function static

2013-12-13 Thread Ramsay Jones
On 13/12/13 00:58, Duy Nguyen wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Ramsay Jones
 ram...@ramsay1.demon.co.uk wrote:
 BTW, I have not been following these patches, but I noticed that the
 'remove_nonexistent_ours_in_pack()' function has no callers. (There are
 two commented out callers - but they seem to have *always* been commented
 out ;-) ). So, step 5 is no longer required? :-D
 
 It's more of an optimization than a requirement, to avoid expensive
 calculation later. Uncommenting is possible but I need to pass the
 pack file name around a bit.
 

Ah, OK.

(I should probably refrain from commenting on code I haven't read ... :-P )

ATB,
Ramsay Jones


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] send-pack.c: mark a file-local function static

2013-12-12 Thread Ramsay Jones

Commit f2c681cf (send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone
via http, 05-12-2013) adds the 'advertise_shallow_grafts_buf'
function as an external symbol. This symbol does not require
more than file visibility.

Noticed by sparse. ('advertise_shallow_grafts_buf' was not declared.
Should it be static?)

Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones ram...@ramsay1.demon.co.uk
---

Hi Duy,

If you need to re-roll the patches in your 'nd/shallow-clone' branch,
could you please squash this into your patch. Thanks!

BTW, I have not been following these patches, but I noticed that the
'remove_nonexistent_ours_in_pack()' function has no callers. (There are
two commented out callers - but they seem to have *always* been commented
out ;-) ). So, step 5 is no longer required? :-D

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

 send-pack.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index 2a199cc..6129b0f 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int advertise_shallow_grafts_cb(const struct 
commit_graft *graft, void *c
return 0;
 }
 
-void advertise_shallow_grafts_buf(struct strbuf *sb)
+static void advertise_shallow_grafts_buf(struct strbuf *sb)
 {
if (!is_repository_shallow())
return;
-- 
1.8.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] send-pack.c: mark a file-local function static

2013-12-12 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Ramsay Jones
ram...@ramsay1.demon.co.uk wrote:
 BTW, I have not been following these patches, but I noticed that the
 'remove_nonexistent_ours_in_pack()' function has no callers. (There are
 two commented out callers - but they seem to have *always* been commented
 out ;-) ). So, step 5 is no longer required? :-D

It's more of an optimization than a requirement, to avoid expensive
calculation later. Uncommenting is possible but I need to pass the
pack file name around a bit.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html